BBC: “Should Homosexuals Face Execution?”

Jim Burroway

December 16th, 2009

Screen capture of the BBC web site, via Pink News (click to enlarge)

Screen capture of the BBC web site, via Pink News (click to enlarge)

It’s hard to imagine any reputable news outlet posing such a question, but that’s what the BBC asked in an online “Have Your Say” forum late yesterday. And to make matters worse, BBC’s editors have defended the decision.

But in response to the furor the the question sparked on Twitter, the internet, and among the forums own respondents, BBC’s editors have since changed the question. It now reads “Should Uganda debate gay execution?” The forum is now closed for comments, but from the outrage expressed by many respondents, it appears that virtually all of them were responding to the original question, “Should homosexuals face execution?”

Most of the comments appear to be a resounding “no!” But there are a few along the lines of this one, from “NF” of Alberta, Canada:

Can I move to Uganda? At least one country in the world is taking moral values seriously (as well as the health of their citizens). It may sound extreme, but that shock value will allow more people to think about their actions beforehand.

And another one from Freetown (no country given):

Bravo to the Ugandians for this wise decision, a bright step in eliminating this menace from your society. We hope other African nations will also follow your bold step.

Next question: Should Kosovars be rounded up an shot?


December 16th, 2009

Freetown is the capital of Sierra Leone, West Africa. i am not suprised by that comment although ironically the guy’s hometown was founded by freed american slaves.


December 16th, 2009

How about this for a topic:

Following President Ahmadinejad’s comments we ask “Should Isreal be Wiped Off the Map?”

Of course, this would never happen as to even ask such a question would be to legitimise it.

And if you read the comments thread, it’s clear that some of the worst comments got through the moderator and were only removed after the sh!t hit the fan.

As an aside, I also note that no Ugandan MP is proposing a law to introduce the death penalty for corruption.


December 16th, 2009

1930s BBC:

“Should Jews be rounded up and sent to concentration camps? Yes, we accept it is a stark and disturbing question. But this is the reality behind the current rise of the Hitler’s Germany, where Jews will face death by gas chambers.

Has Germany gone too far? Should there be any level of legislation against Judaism? Should Jews be protected by legislation as they are in the United States? What would be the consequences of this bill to you? How will Jews be monitored? Send us your views.”


December 16th, 2009

Thank you so much, Jim, for all the work you are doing to expose this stuff.

Take a look at this Exodus Global Alliance newsletter (available online at and you’ll see the ex-gay movement “educating” medical students in places like Uganda and Rwanda (as well as Sundan, which currently allows the death penalty for homosexuality).


December 16th, 2009

Some of the brighter anti-gay activists may be aware that talking about gay marriage, even campaigning against it, means bringing the concept to the wider public. Once that happens, people will inevitably come to see it a possibility, and may even start considering it in rational terms. Uganda’s bill has brought the reverse of this. Most people in the West will dismiss it at a sign of an immature democracy, but in other countries it might yet gain traction. And even telling them why it is wrong is telling them that someone has done it, and making it into a more serious option. It’s a double bind.


December 16th, 2009

Hm. I guess I’m in the minority, but I think the question “Should Homosexuals Face Execution?” is fascinating, and I really wish I could see what the results of the BBC poll turned out to be.

I’m a gay man, and I feel that we’re sometimes too delicate in our rhetoric when it comes to debating and discussing gay issues. I’m tired of hearing people who oppose something perfectly fair and reasonable, such as same-sex marriage–or even civil unions–claim that they are not bigots. I think it would be useful to get our opponents to acknowledge that bigots _exist_, and that every time they make an argument opposing gay rights, it behooves them to explain what the difference is between their position and a bigot’s position. Eventually, it will become clear that for many issues, there isn’t a difference.

Proposition 8 passed in California with a 52.3% majority. Most of the people who voted for Prop 8 probably don’t support the execution of homosexuals. But some of the millions of voters surely do. How many? If, for example, 2.301% of the electorate happen to believe that, then it’s worth pointing out that the only reason same-sex marriage is illegal is because of the support of people who want to kill gays.

Maggie Gallagher and Rick Warren, for example, probably really honestly believe that they are not bigots. They should know that their initiatives would never have passed without the support of repugnant bigots, and they should feel pressured to distance themselves from these bigots _every_ _time_ they talk.

This is not to say that the BBC poll was well-constructed. Polls that involve self-selection are statistically irrelevant. But the idea that it’s somehow inappropriate to examine the _extreme_ hate that’s out there allows too many people to hold the comfortable belief that extremist hatred doesn’t exist.

Ben in Oakland

December 17th, 2009

Very good, Phil. As i wrote in another context, in reasponse to this comment:

“The most egregious of this is the issue of hating gays. Nothing could be further from the truth.”

Of course you don’t hate us and this isn’t about bigotry. you love us. It’s the christian thing to do. You don’t hate anyone. Honestly, you don’t. The Biblical message is all about compassion, about loving your neighbor and all that. You love homosexuals. You really do. You just hate our same-sex-lusting,public-fornicating, child molesting, disease spreading, marriage ruining, family wrecking, military compromising, religious freedom hating, god detesting, Christian disparaging, faith villifying, society-endangering ways. And really now, where’s the hate in that? Of course, you want to call it love instead of hate because hate is, well, so hateful.


December 17th, 2009

Should bigots face execution?
Should blacks face execution?
Should asians face execution?
Should people face execution?
Been there, done that.


December 17th, 2009

Somehow that last statement had gotten munged on the way to being published.
The last statement originally read:
“Should religion-other-than-your-own people face execution”

Richard Rush

December 17th, 2009

It’s fascinating to hear this often-used phrase: “As Christians we are called upon to love the homosexual.”

It’s obvious that their “love” is just a performance. They have memorized a script. And that’s part of why they can easily support draconian policies with a clear conscience and a smile. They can view themselves as good people doing what is necessary for the benefit of homosexuals and society. And, of course, it emboldens them to know their policies are stamped “DEITY APPROVED.”

I do believe there are people out there capable of promoting extermination with a loving smile.


December 17th, 2009

Phil said:

“I think the question “Should Homosexuals Face Execution?” is fascinating”

I’m sure that any homosexual hanging from a tree will be gratified in their final moments by the thought that you find the morality of their death a such stimulating topic.


December 17th, 2009

What are you saying? I think you’re misunderstanding my statement. Otherwise, I interpret your post to mean that homosexuals hanging from trees would rather their deaths go unmentioned.

That said, I didn’t mean to suggest that I find the executions of people merely to be stimulating. However, all communication is symbolic; an interrogative sentence about death is not the same as a death. The fact that people often confuse words with what they represent does not make it so.

The BBC actually asked the question, “Should homosexuals face execution?”–really? How bizarre! And how completely in line with something I am genuinely curious about: How many people believe that gay people should face execution?

Timothy (TRiG)

December 17th, 2009

The Guardian wasn’t impressed.



December 17th, 2009

Honestly I rather liked that they didn’t beat around the bush. Let people see the naked disgusting truth of the measure being debated in Uganda, so that it can be rejected so clearly the way it ought to be, instead of dancing around and trying to pretend that it’s simply not the “best” way of dealing with the “issue.”


December 17th, 2009

On its face, the question was completely out of line. I would like to think however (not that I give the BBC credit to have the cleverness or intelligence to come up with this) that the question was posed in such a way as to point out the disgusting nature of what Uganda is doing, to present it in as harsh a light as possible, to in fact highlight the idea that debating the legal execution of a group of people is simply unconscionable. By framing the question in its purist form, eliminating any Uganda reference, they forced the bigots out and showed them to be in line with those who would support gassing Jews or lynching blacks. Or, at least, were they actually that sneaky and clever, they would have, instead of just bungling the whole thing and making themselves look like idiots and bigots themselves.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts


Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.