State Dept: Ugandan President Promises To Block Anti-Gay Bill

Jim Burroway

December 19th, 2009

Uganda President Yoweri Museveni

Uganda's President Yoweri Museveni

DCAgenda, the Washington, D.C. LGBT newspaper that rose from the ashes of the venerable Washington Blade, reports that Uganda’s President Yoweri Museveni has committed to preventing the proposed Anti-Homosexuality Bill from becoming law on at least two separate occasions. According to U.S. State Department spokesman Jon Tollefson:

Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson received this assurance from Museveni on Oct. 24 during an in-person meeting with the president in Uganda and again during a phone conversation with Museveni on Dec. 4, Tollefson said.

…Asked whether it\’s the understanding of U.S. officials that Museveni would veto the legislation should it come to his desk, Tollefson replied, “Right, that\’s a commitment that he\’s made. He made that personally to the assistant secretary on that first meeting that he had on Oct. 24 and again on a call on Dec. 4, and so we\’re going to continue to expect that.”

Tollefson also said that the State Department wants Museveni to make a public statement against the legislation, but so far the Ugandan president has not done so. While Museveni has not made his position known publicly, he has allowed Ugandan government controlled or owned media to publish two op-eds calling on Parliament to drop the Anti-Homosexuality Bill in recent weeks. The second op-ed was written by John Nagenda, a senior advisor to Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, and appeared in the government-owned New Vision which is Uganda’s largest newspaper.

DCAgenda’s report greatly expands on the hint that was dropped in yesterday’s AFP article which I discussed earlier today. When I wrote that post, I settled on the headline “Will Musevini Sign the Anti-Homosexuality Bill?” I vacillated between that headline and its alternate, “Will Museveni Veto the Anti-Homosexuality Bill?” It appears now that perhaps I should have gone with the more optimistic question. But until Museveni makes his views known publicly, it is still an open question.

Click here to see BTB\’s complete coverage of recent anti-gay developments in Uganda.


December 19th, 2009

I don’t know anything about the Ugandan political system. Can they override a veto?

Jim Burroway

December 19th, 2009

Great question. Uganda’s constitution (PDF 460KB/192 pages) allows Parliament to override a Presidential veto with a 2/3rd approval. The National Resistance Movement, which is the President’s ruling party, controls 205 of the Parliament’s 319 seats. The Ugandan army, which is under the president’s command and holds ten more seats, conceivably gives the president a veto-proof majority. I doubt that many, if any, NRM legislators would go against the president and risk losing their job in the 2011 elections.


December 20th, 2009

Uganda’s Constitution… oh, puh-lease. Fantasyland.

If anyone was taking any notice of Uganda’s Constitution this situation wouldn’t exist in the first place.

A veto by Parliament on a matter like this would be rapidly followed by the sound of a Lear-Jet leaving Kampala for Geneva.

Him. Or them.

Museveni may veto them. But they may not embarrass him. That’s the deal. More likely, the Act would be sent off to quietly die in committee. If he so wishes.

Whatever the semblance to democracy, Museveni is riding a tiger. The dismount is always the tricky part.


December 20th, 2009

If Museveni was already promising to block this legislation back in October, and again earlier this month, why is this the first we’ve heard of it?


December 20th, 2009

I don’t believe anything any politician promises in private until I hear or see it publicly. I can hope though…


December 20th, 2009

I’ll believe it when I see it on both the blocking part and the stopping of an override. Uganda comes across as fanatically anti-gay, as if 98% of the population would gladly execute a gay person. My heart trembles for those with no place to turn.

David C.

December 21st, 2009

Uganda comes across as fanatically anti-gay, as if 98% of the population would gladly execute a gay person. My heart trembles for those with no place to turn.—Ray

Ray, I’m not sure that’s really the case though I have no way of really knowing. I suspect it is much like it is here in the US: those that are rabidly anti-gay are in the minority but are nevertheless very loud and constantly in the face of society to manifest their hatred.

Hard to say what’s happening, but it is curious that the president would allow this legislation to get so far in a legislative body that he allegedly has so much control over while simultaneously taking the position he is advertising. I suspect there is far more going on below the surface than we and the rest of the world are privy to.

A blatant attack on human rights like this proposed legislation will have a profound economic impact on Uganda if it goes on to become law. The president would be very wise to kill this bill. His country is surrounded by some other politically unstable countries and it would be to his and his country’s advantage to moderate the more strident religo-political forces before they alienate Uganda’s economic and humanitarian partners.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.