Report: Uganda’s Cabinet “Rejects” Anti-Gay Bill

Jim Burroway

May 7th, 2010

I put the word “rejects” in quotation marks because it’s very difficult to discern whether this really represents the long-awaited death knell for Uganda’s proposed Anti-Homosexuality Bill. But this report from tomorrow’s Saturday Monitor, Uganda’s largest independent newspaper, is unusually optimistic:

A committee of Cabinet has made recommendations that could end Ndorwa West MP David Bahati’s proposal to have a separate law punishing homosexuality in Uganda. The recommendations, which Saturday Monitor has seen, come close to dismissing Mr Bahati’s draft legislation.

The committee, put together to advise the government after Mr Bahati’s draft legislation left Uganda condemned by sections of the international community, looked deep into the language, tone and relevance of the draft legislation, dissecting every clause to determine its usefulness.

It was not clear who wrote the draft legislation, the committee’s report says, noting that the document had “technical defects in form and content”. The result left the draft legislation almost bare, as nearly all of the clauses were found either redundant, repetitive of existing laws, or even useless. In fact, the committee found that only “Clause 13″ of the draft legislation, about the promotion of homosexuality, had some merit.

…”The Anti-Homosexuality Bill should be reviewed since some provisions of the Constitution were not followed in the process of drafting and that, therefore, it was illegally before Parliament,” the report says, adding that “some sections of the Penal Code Act could be amended to include some good provisions” of the draft law. This kind of amendment, the committee’s report says, is the preferable option.

The suggestion that advocacy of homosexuality could still be outlawed (“Clause 13”) remains troublesome. The draconian Anti-Homosexuality Bill’s ban on “promoting homosexuality” is far-reaching. Not only would it criminalize pro-LGBT speech and advocacy, it would also hinder medical workers, since providing advice on safe-sex practices to reduce the chance of becoming infected with HIV, for example, could be seen as “promoting homosexuality.”

This appears to be further revelations from a Cabinet report first reported by Monitor two weeks ago. That report seemed to indicate that the Cabinet was interested in moving unspecified provisions of the Anti-Homosexuality Bill into other legislation and pass them on the slight. This report suggests that the bill would be scrapped, with the possible exception of Clause 13. Given the uncertainty of the whole situation, the ultimate fate of the LGBT community in Uganda remains a very deep concern and will continue to bear close scrutiny.

Stefano A

May 7th, 2010

One “take away” I got from this is a high likelihood of the passage of a Lithuania-like (but stricter) “Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information”.

In addition to simply amending existing bills to incorporate the draconian aspects of Bahati’s bill rather than leaving it as a stand alone (or new) bill.

In other words, my expectation is that not much will improve and am waiting to see the actual amount of damage they’re committed to creating.


May 7th, 2010

i’ve noticed a strange dichotomy while observing how ugandans discuss the anti-homosexuality bill and homosexuality in general. those who don’t express strong anti-gay views are often accused of “promoting homosexuality” (not yet a crime, but that’s what it might become). those who understood and attempted to explain how the bill would violate human rights would have to sandwich their human rights perspective with mild anti-gay statements as a disclaimer… like, “i’m not gay and i believe that homosexuality is wrong/repugnant/evil/a sin/an abomination/against god/unafrican, BUT ”

those opposing the bill would have to tiptoe their way around being accused of promoting homosexuality, being “pro-gay” or receiving pink dollars from the western-based multi-billion dollar neo-colonialist Gay International Organisation floating somewhere up in the sky, drizzling big bucks on those willing to oppose the bill, promote homosexuality or recruit kids.

i saw the contents of the “teenager’s toolkit” publication from unicef… it advised teens struggling with same sex attractions not to freak out and advised peers to be compassionate towards those struggling with same sex attractions… stuff like that got unicef accused of “promoting homosexuality” in schools.

as pointed out in the article, outlawing “the promotion of homosexuality” would present a major setback in that country’s HIV/AIDS response.

entering a gay chatroom, setting up a profile on a gay personals website, sending a text message to your same gender significant other, purchasing will & grace dvds, joining an LGBT facebook group, a pride flag on your bumper, or posting comments on LGBT websites… any of those actions could get you 5 to 7 years for “promoting homosexuality”.

“promoting homosexuality” is extremely broad and breaches freedom of speech, and or the right to privacy. dunno about freedom of speech in uganda, but the right to privacy is in the ugandan constitution.

while this development is very welcome – it’s much better than passing that horrible bill as it was written… call me pushy or ungrateful, but i’m sorry… this isn’t good enough.

these guys wanna imprison people over “promoting homosexuality” because they know that as long as Ugandans are free to talk, discuss or debate LGBT concerns – gay rights for LGBT Ugandans will become an inevitable reality. so, in a twisted acceptance of defeat, they shut the whole thing down because they are anticipating a serious intellectual, legal, theological and international beat down in their fight against LGBT rights. that’s all they’ve got left.

clearly uganda wants and needs to be part of the global community. i think they’ve got a seat on the UN security council, we’ve all heard about ugandan oil reserves. but introducing laws against “promoting homosexuality” is so backward and auto-ostracizing in a world where openly gay people serve as big decision makers in politics, religion, development, trade etc. this, while the rest of the world debates gay marriage, anti-discrimination laws for LGBT citizens or at least decriminalization of homosexuality.

they should not be allowed to get away with this.


May 7th, 2010

years ago, a ugandan lesbian couple had their home raided by security agents in the middle of the night. they were treated really badly in detention. they took it to court and were awarded compensation. that pissed off a lot of people.

if “promoting homosexuality” were a crime, they wouldnt have access to legal assistance. lawyers wouldnt be in a hurry to help them, since court would be quick to punish those who “promote homosexuality” by defending LGBT ugandans in court… 5 to 7 years aint no joke.

ugandans need to decriminalize homosexuality and introduce laws to protect its LGBT citizens from dangerous elements in their anti-gay environment.

Paul in Canada

May 8th, 2010

International pressure must be kept to not only eliminate any possibility of any part of this draft law coming into effect, but in fact, ensure rights for LGBT are instituted in Uganda!

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.