Scott Lively Warns of Nazi-Like Takeover If DADT Is Repealed

Jim Burroway

June 2nd, 2010

Holocaust revisionist Scott Lively has a new post up at his web site, in which he promises to personally go all-out to oppose the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” by distributing copies of his book, The Pink Swastika to every member of the Senate — assuming he can get the donations he needs. Yes, there’s a fundraising angle, but that shouldn’t distract anyone from understanding that Lively is a true believer in his Holocaust revisionism whether it pays him a red cent or not.

In the Pink Swastika, Lively posits that the German Nazi movement was, at it’s very core, a homosexual movement, and that militant and violent fascism is the core feature and goal of the LGBT equality movement. He uses that same twisted view of history to argue against DADT’s repeal.

Lively certainly can’t be faulted for having an overly-active imagination. Consider his prediction of what will happen if DADT is repealed. First, if gays are allowed in the military, then straight people will refuse to serve. Those straights who remain will turn to violence in response to the unrelenting sexual harassment. That violence will lead to “politically correct” sensitivity training, which will prompt a further exodus. This then leads to a draft, which would be supported by the “anti-war Lefties.” But that sensitivity training? It won’t work, so they will have to segregate the services into gay and straight units. And that’s when the homosexuals take over all the branches of the military — just like, he says, what happened in Nazi Germany.

Whether or not a segregated service was initiated, a homosexual subculture of servicemen would form, characterized by intense internal loyalty and political ambition. Eventually, this “army within an army,” buoyed by pro-homosexual “affirmative action,” and the ability to act covertly (due to the fact that some would remain “closeted”) would come to dominate the services. What would they do with such power? The historical precedents are uniformly bad.

And just when the gay-Brownshirts have their own private army, that’s when the gay-hating Muslims gang up and attack. The end.

You know, I hope Lively does succeed in getting his message to every U.S. Senator. If he didn’t exist, we’d have to invent him.

But in all seriousness, the truly disturbing part of this whole thing is this: Lively’s lunacy is easy to laugh at when he lets his paranoia run wild here in the U.S. But when he exports it to Russia, Eastern Europe or Uganda, it causes real and lasting damage. He’s a buffoon, but that doesn’t mean he’s not mortally dangerous.

justsearching

June 2nd, 2010

In the 1920’s, gays in Germany were more accepted than in most parts of the world. Hitler comes along and the government bans all gay organizations, burns scholarly works on homosexuality, murders some known homosexuals within the Nazi Party, arrests nearly 100,000 men accused of homosexuality up to the end of WWI, placing perhaps up to 15,000 of those in concentration camps.

I wonder if Lively considers these details to be important. I agree with Tim. I hope every last senator gets to hear or read Lively’s arguments against DADT.

Swampfox

June 2nd, 2010

The man is utterly daffy.

Jonathan

June 2nd, 2010

Considering the fact that
a Christian subculture of servicemen has formed, characterized by intense internal loyalty and political ambition. Eventually, this “army within an army,” buoyed by pro-Christian “affirmative action,” and the ability to act covertly (due to the fact that some would remain “closeted“) has come to dominate the services. What have they done with such power? The historical precedents are uniformly bad, particularly those at the Air Force Academy, an institution that while under the control of evangelical Christian hierarchy and cadet corp suffered the worst rape record in the history of the Service Academies.

KZ

June 2nd, 2010

People against repealing DADT know that their losing this battle. Desperate times call for loonier claims. Just days ago, Bryan Fischer, certified idiot at the AFA, reiterated Lively’s claim that Hilter and his closest military advisors were gay.

Bart

June 2nd, 2010

We are in an era where if you say somethimg loud enough, long enough it is then considered fact. That’s the theory that people like Scott Lively adhere to. In a country with a vast internet connection, where media is ever-present, this idiotic ridiculousness never really gains traction other than to make the speaker look like a tin foil hat wearer with one too many cats who thinks that aliens are listening to his thoughts. The sophistication of the typical American far outshines the science fiction spouted by a Scott Lively. But in a less sophisiticated country like Uganda, it creates a rip tide cesspool that draws people into it because their reality is what someone tells them it is, like the poo-poo obsessed Rev. Sempa (for those who have heard him speak, you’ll know what I’m talking about.) Is a Scott Lively dangerous in this country? Probably not. Most likely, he actually hurts his own cause because he turns off even ardent homophobes with is bizarre socio-fantasies. But elsewhere in the world, he is both shamefully and disgustingly dangerous. And if he truly believes in the God he sometimes speaks about, people like Lively and the nutty Sempa are destined for the same hell they want to condemn other people into.

Dan Vojir

June 2nd, 2010

The Gay Blood Libel

Bart: I agree with you about Uganda, but not about Lively’s influence in the U.S. You said “the sophistication of the typical American.” Well, that “sophistication” has eroded over the years and the Christofascist Right has been largely at fault: a surprising percentage of people believe in the kind of anthropomorphized, vengeful, jealous God of the Old Testament than we had previously thought, giving rise to homeschooling, The Creation Museum and the Texas School Board.

The Gay Blood Libel may stick to people willing to believe that gays were responsible for the Holocaust. These are people who need hatred for the sake of hatred. Please don’t discount Lively. Some lives may be at stake.

SharonB

June 2nd, 2010

Jonathan raises an exceptionally prescient point: here Lively is merely projecting on his enemies(gays) what he and his relionistas have secretly wished to do, and to a degree have accomplished in the military!

Mike

June 2nd, 2010

I think I would like to help Lively get a copy of his book into the hands of every senator, just so that they might realize what kind of extremist nutjob he is.

Lynn David

June 2nd, 2010

Lively’s worst nightmare isn’t the homoerotic-militaristic fantasies he makes up and puts in books. It’s two men or two women walking hand in hand down a street pushing a baby carriage while an older lady stops to congratulate the parents on their children. So here’s to Lively’s worst nightmare, may find its way into the very heart of America.

Derrick

June 3rd, 2010

Lively’s work is dangerous even though it is laughably wrong. Why is it dangerous? Because most Americans don’t know how to evaluate arguments and evidence.

Lively discusses a handful of people in the Nazi movement who are alleged (some based on nothing more than rumor or gossip) to have been gay, confidently asserts that they were all gay, asserts that Nazism was caused by their “homosexuality” and further asserts that gays in America in 2010 are potential or actual Nazis.

In a recent letter on this subject, posted on his site, he offers as evidence of the American gay movement’s fascist leanings the fact that the first gay group in America was formed in Chicago in 1924. That group had a parent organization in Berlin. That group in Berlin had a member, Ernst Roehm, who became a Nazi. Accordingly, although neither the Chicago organization, the Berlin organization, nor any of its founders were Nazi and even these organizations ceased to exist decades before the rise of the modern gay rights movement, the membership of Roehm is evidence of the Nazi leanings of the gay movement. To a good number of people, this all makes perfect sense.

oatc

August 4th, 2010

“But when he exports it to Russia, Eastern Europe or Uganda, it causes real and lasting damage.”

A real shame then that, while he is free to export his hatred, the interviews that destroy his credibility are restricted to US viewers only.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1646: Execution in New Netherlands Colony

Today In History, 1741: An Early Ex-Gay Testimony

Today In History, 1962: Supreme Court Rules Physique Magazines Are Not Pornographic

Today In History, 1972: United Church of Christ Ordains First Gay Minister

Today In History, 1978: Rainbow Flag Debuts

Born On This Day, 1935: Larry Kramer

Born On This Day, 1963: George Michael

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.