Montana’s GOP Gets To The Point

Jim Burroway

June 28th, 2010

The Texas GOP needed 632 words to talk about all the many ways they want to legislate against LGBT Texans, including the reimposition of laws to throw gay people in jail. Which just goes to show what we’ve always known about Texans: they’re full of hot air. Montana’s GOP essentially says the same thing, but displays the directness and economy of words that the folks in Big Sky country are known for:

Homosexual Acts
We support the clear will of the people of Montana expressed by legislation to keep homosexual acts illegal.

There’s a silver lining though. They don’t seem interested in jailing anyone who conducts a same-sex marriage ceremony. But looking at the bigger picture, those mere twenty words are still saying the same thing. They want your gay butt in jail.

Lindoro Almaviva

June 28th, 2010

Too bad “the people” were told they were a bunch of bigots way too long ago and they can not do anything about it.

Sometimes I wish someone would just pass a law that was clearly pointed to criminalize something heterosexuals do. I don’t know, bad divorce and nullify every divorce (and subsequent marriage) performed since 1990. I would love to see what would happen.


June 29th, 2010

Since anti-gays like to harp on the presumed ability of heterosexual couples to reproduce “naturally,” I suggest that any heterosexual marriage which does not result in a naturally occurring (i.e. no fertility drugs, artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization – only one penis ejaculating into one vagina allowed!) pregnancy within the first five years should be automatically dissolved, with no opportunity for that couple to remarry (they can try again with other spouses). I’ll be charitable and say that verified pregnancies resulting in stillbirth or miscarriage do “count” for this purpose.

Jim in MA

June 29th, 2010

Good one – I’d sign that petition any day.


June 29th, 2010

I guess they missed the notice that the Montana Supreme Court struck down the sodomy law 13 years ago in Gryczan v. Montana(1997). Not to mention that the US Supreme Court struck the remaining laws down in 2003. Where have they been?

John Trudell

June 29th, 2010

It’s been in the Montana Republican platform for a long time.

The Texas Republican platform isn’t new either. The platform has contained the same anti-gay language for years.

But it’s a good thing that somebody finally noticed it.


June 29th, 2010

Let’s hear from someone who defends the Republican party. I wonder how they could work with these hateful people?

How can this direction be a defensible situation by any sane person?

Christian Hoffland

June 29th, 2010

This, of course, completely ignores the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States’ decision in Lawrence vs. Texas nullifies any attempt by a state to criminalize “homosexual acts.” Sorry, Montana and Texas GOP: this is not going to fly. But thanks for trying. Not.


June 29th, 2010

It also ignores the fact that there likely is no longer a “clear will of the people” in Montana in favor of criminalization.


June 29th, 2010

Please note that party platforms very frequently include positions that the party has absolutely no intention of campaigning on or voting for. This is not in any way a new phenomenon. Traditionally, assignment to a state party’s platform committee has been a way to reward people who have raised a significant amount of money for the party but who are, for various reasons, unsuited to hold positions of actual authority within the party. If a platform position looks like it was written by someone in the manic phase of bipolar disorder, the most likely reason is that the person who wrote it was in fact bipolar and was in a manic phase when he wrote it.


July 1st, 2010

“It also ignores the fact that there likely is no longer a “clear will of the people” in Montana in favor of criminalization.” – Burr

Are you sure about that?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts


Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.