Appeal fears

Timothy Kincaid

August 16th, 2010

Some of those who were closely watching Perry v. Schwarzenegger are now concerned about the prospect of going to the Supreme Court and possibly losing big. And that fear is not coming only from our community; anti-gays also have some who advise to quit now.

Right Wing Watch has transcript of a conversation between the WallBuilders’ David Barton, and the AFA’s Tim Wildmon and Marvin Sanders:

Barton: Right now the damage is limited to California only, but if California appeals this to the US Supreme Court, the US Supreme Court with Kennedy will go for California, which means all 31 states will go down in flames, although right now this decision is limited only to California.

So there’s an effort underway to say “California, please don’t appeal this. I mean, if you appeal this, its bad for you guys but live with it, but don’t cause the rest of us to have to go down your path.”

Wildom: So you think the better situation here would be California not to appeal …

Barton: Well, I’m telling you that that’s what is being argued by a lot of folks now because the other Supreme Court attorney who watched this from afar said “on no, you left too many arguments on the table, you stayed technical.” And now, knowing what Kennedy has already done in two similar cases to this and knowing that he’s the deciding vote, the odds are 999 out of 1000 that they’ll uphold the California decision.

If they do, there’s not a marriage amendment in the country that can stand. And so the problem is that instead of California losing its amendment, now 31 states lose their amendment. And that won’t happen if California doesn’t appeal this decision. It’s just California that loses its amendment.

This appeal really is a high stakes game.

TonyJazz

August 16th, 2010

Another thing to keep in mind is that the conservative Roberts court could go against us—but it would eventually be reversed in subsequent years. Don’t forget that sodomy laws were once upheld by the supremes, as well…

It’s a shame that Obama hasn’t had a chance to replace any of the conservatives on the court, as we’re all paying for Souter and Thomas (and their animosity towards the ‘little guy’) already….

TampaZeke

August 16th, 2010

We have much more to gain than lose.

If California doesn’t appeal then Olson and Boies need to go to another state and do the same thing they did in California.

Pender

August 16th, 2010

It is very high stakes. On the other hand, we will likely NEVER have better facts, record, trial court decision or advocates. And if Obama loses his reelection in 2012 or the Democrats lose their Senate majority, and then any of Kennedy, Breyer or Ginsburg leaves the Court, the loss will be just as durable and awful if not more so than losing on the merits.

If we had lost at the trial level or not yet filed suit in the first place, this would be a no-brainer pedal-to-the-metal moment. With the prospect of killing Prop 8 and leaving it there as the alternative, I’m really torn.

Jason D

August 17th, 2010

I’m reminded that a few years back when Olson and Boise showed up, everyone said “no, too soon, too soon!” and or “they’re conservatives, they’re trying to sabotage us, they’ll throw the case on purpose!”

And now look where we are.
Conservative(formerly conservative?) lawyers successfully arguing a civil rights case to a conservative judge who decides in our favor.

ALL without the help of HRC, ACLU, or any of the people asking us for donations.

Timothy Kincaid

August 17th, 2010

We have much more to gain than lose.

Unless, of course, you live in California. Guess where I live?

Timothy Kincaid

August 17th, 2010

Jason,

Ted Olson is not “formerly” conservative. He just happens to believe that equality under the law is a very conservative notion.

Pender

August 17th, 2010

Timothy, if you got married during the “window of opportunity,” then striking down Prop 8 likely won’t have a substantive legal effect on you anyway. It’s about the intangibles, federal equality, and those who either missed the window of opportunity or are among the 90% of America who lives in states that aren’t California. And all of those interests are much better served by a win at the U.S. Supreme Court than in a N. Cal. district court.

Jason D

August 17th, 2010

Timothy, thanks for the correction, that why it was in parenthesis, I was hoping someone knew if the lawyers had changed ideologies or just found our situation not to be at odds with it.

ricky

August 17th, 2010

The entire anti gay movement is dedicated to the effort of keeping gays as the scapegoat that it is perfectly acceptable to hate, despise, deny rights to, and freely tell they are going to hell for being the evil dirty depraved person they are. Each and every one of them, no questions asked. For nothing that a gay person thinks says or does is valid and can never be right because they are gay and therefore “intrinsically evil”. Because we say so. They have no right to a say in the matter. End of discussion. We cannot be wrong on this.

They used to do this not only to the gays but to the Jews, the witches and the heretics. Unfortunately for them witches are not real and Hitler ruined the Jews for them. The heretics were the only ones that won out, hence all the denominations of a so called “Christianity”, many making money keeping down “the gays”. These same people used to claim a biblical right to own people and don’t you dare tell them they don’t you liberal bleeding heart slave lover.

They ignore the fact gays are the people they used to burn alive next to the witches and the heretics and the people Hitler sent to the death camps right along with the Jews.

Both the Jews and the witches were blamed for illness just as the gays are today. It never mattered that the Jews were dying right along side or that there is no such thing as witchcraft, there was someone to blame. And it was a belief sanctioned by the church, both Catholic and Protestant, just like slavery.

They had books and proofs against the witches and the Jews. Holy writ sanctioned by the church comprised of nothing falsehoods. Things which were not then and have never been true. Things which could not be wrong and never could be wrong but were wrong.

After centuries of church sponsored hate all they have left are the gays. The catch all catagory you could use when heretic or witch wouldn’t work and the victim wasn’t a Jew. An entire group for which it was acceptable to deny all human and civil rights. A group which could be imprisoned in this country for dissemination of information, for gathering in groups of two or more in public or private, for touching, for being. People who could be jailed, guilty of nothing but the very fact they existed as they did or as someone claimed they did. Condemned to ridicule and shame, deprivation and hardship. The slightest hint that they might be “that way” justification to throw them out, no questions asked, or to call the authorities to haul them off to the prisons or the asylum. And then there was it’s justification for murder. Another depraved sinner off the streets. They had it coming for being who they were. They were only a filthy…

All justifiable in the eyes of the Lord. For the bible tells me so, human rights and the constitution be damned. Forever and ever. Just like with the Jews, just like with the witches. How dare they infringe upon my right to hate and despise them, to wish to deny them rights. How dare they. Their very being offends me and I have a right granted to me by my religion which supercedes all to denounce them in the public square and to denigrate them as an entire group and condemn them to hell in the afterlife and to make them as miserable in this life as I possibly can. For they deserve no “special” right to the same things I am entitled to because they are on a long list of sins nobody accepts as sins anymore. They have it coming and it is my right to give it to them. If the bible isn’t good enough I have “science” and “facts”, and please ignore the man behind the curtain with evidence which refutes what I say because it cannot be right as it favors the depraved sinners and therefore must be wrong for the bible tells me so.

The gays have to put up with it. For them to not put up with it just proves how evil and debased they are, shoving their sex life in my face, I don’t care if they don’t have sex or not my mere thinking they might is enough.

That folks, is all they have.

Since the 1950’s gays have won the rights in court to form organizations, send information on homosexuality through the mail and to be able to gather in groups of two or more. Laws designed to keep gays from the courthouse have been deemed unconstitutional as were those which criminalized private consensual sex, and the “gay panic” defense is no longer valid.

It is time to kick the modern day witch hunters to the curb and grant their victims, for that is what they are, the right to not live in fear that they might be fired from their employment or kicked out of their home because they are or have the been labeled as gay. The same rights the witch hunters have and wish to deny.

pierre denerome

August 17th, 2010

Ricky, une exellente analogie.Merci mon ami.

mikeksf

August 17th, 2010

Ricky, very well said. And last week I would have agreed entirely, but after listening to the news all day and reading BTB a few days ago (regarding naming a gay bar at the Islamic cultural center site) I’d have to say that the go to group to hate are Muslims. The witch hunters want their Constitutional protections, but not for any one else because the Bible told them so.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.