Sen Lundberg (inadvertently?) demonstrates how his family enjoys heterosexual privilege

Daniel Gonzales

March 23rd, 2011

Today the Colorado Senate held a floor debate on SB 172, civil unions.  The main opposition came from Senator Kevin Lundberg who we have video of thanks to The Colorado Channel.

One of the main ideas of heterosexual privilege is never having your family questioned.

Follow the logic if you can (paraphrased)

  • I, Kevin Lundberg, had my wife hospitalized last week and nobody questioned our family, for I am just a simple man in a position of power… and heterosexual… and white…
  • If there are gays in my district or elsewhere in the state, I haven’t heard any stories of them having trouble in medical situations.  Surely nobody would ever question the validity of a non-traditional family!  And certainly not in the rural areas I represent.
  • By extension there is no problem with gays making medical decisions and this bill is unnecessary.

Here’s the video excerpt:

PC

March 23rd, 2011

I always pay attention to qualifiers.

He said he doesn’t know of any “current” examples. Does he know of examples from the past?

Kathy

March 23rd, 2011

Seriously? he and his wife don’t have trouble in the hospital so gay folks must be lying? This is rich.

Kelly

March 23rd, 2011

Heh. I’m a straight woman, biological mother to my son, married to his biological father, with no custody issues whatsoever, and I’ve had my guardianship of my son questioned by a hospital. It was an easily resolved misunderstanding, but the very fact that it was so easily resolved really drove home for me the concept of heterosexual privilege.

Tone

March 23rd, 2011

My same-sex spouse and I are Canadian and legally married. Because much of the world does not recognize our marriage we’ve both had to consult lawyers and have durable power of attorney documents drawn up so that we are able to travel with relative safety. Should one of us become incapacitated while we’re on vacation who knows how the hospital could react. It is within the realm of possibility that they would bypass the spouse and look to our families of origin to make life and death decisions. Since neither of us have any contact with our families that would be a most unwelcome turn of events.

This senator has no idea at all what same-sex couples are up against in a heterosexist society. Heterosexual privilege is thrown in our faces every day of our lives.

Matt

March 24th, 2011

“and white…”

Where does this come from?

Rob in San Diego

March 24th, 2011

Well we know who wears the pants in his family. I wonder if he had any problems hospitalizing his wife before they got married. But then again, like most heterosexuals they probably only dated 3 to 6 months before getting married. He probably had his first kid before he got married. I wonder if he’s ever had to testify against his wife, I wonder if they file their taxes jointly? I wonder if she’s on HIS insurance, or if he’s on HER’s? I wonder if he’s ever traveled to a country that doesn’t accept his marriage. Oh wait, he’s a heterosexual, it’s like a VISA card, it’s accept everywhere.

Lightning Baltimore

March 25th, 2011

As a Caucasian, I have never been eyed suspiciously by others or harrassed for no apparent reason other than my skin color. Therefore, I think it’s a myth that black people experience these things.

As a non-Hispanic looking American, I have never been accused of being an illegal alien, and have never been threatened by authorities with deportation. Therefore, I think it’s a myth that Hispanic citizens experience these things.

</sarcasm>

What an ass!

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Texas Leads A Five-State Lawsuit Over Obamacare Transgender Rules

Wikileaks Outs Saudi Gay Men, Male Rape Victims, People With HIV

Is Australia's Marriage Equality Plebiscite Doomed?

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1970: New York Times Looks At "Homosexuals In Revolt"

Today In History, 1977: "The Advocate" Reports Another FBI Document Dump On Gay Rights Groups

Today In History, 1977: Houston Klan: "We Endorse and Seek the Execution of All Homosexuals"

Today In History, 1988: Canada's Largest Protestant Church Accepts Gay Ordination

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.