September 22nd, 2011
That’s what AP reporter David Crary tweeted:
John Eastman’s bio at Chapman University is here. He’s an attorney and founding director of the conservative Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, which is affiliated with the Claremont Institute, dedicated to “restor[ing] the principles of the American founding fathers to their rightful, preeminent authority in our national life. Eastman is also a former law clerk for US Supreme Court Justice Clarance Thomas. We’ll have more as this develops.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
David S.
September 22nd, 2011
Harry Jaffa, the founder of the Claremont Institute, is a passionate anti-gay ideologue. He infamously claimed that tolerance of homosexuality is comparable to tolerance of slavery.
Key to his argument is this bizarre assertion: “Slavery is against nature, because it treats human beings like subhuman chattel. Sodomy is against nature, since it treats men as if they were women.”
http://claremont.org/publications/pubid.694/pub_detail.asp
Jaffa also wrote an article, published by the Claremont Institute, in which he insists that a person who refuses to condemn homosexuality has no principled basis for condemning the actions of serial murderer and rapist Ted Bundy:
http://66.49.128.70/Subjects/SexualImmorality/Homosexuality/HomoAndNaturalLaw.htm
justme
September 22nd, 2011
Meet the new bigoted idiot, same as the old bigoted idiot.
Timothy Kincaid
September 22nd, 2011
You may recall that Eastman is the guy that NOM supported for CA Attorney General in 2010. Eastman received 34.5% of the Primary vote, losing the Republican nomination.
In September 2010 (having just lost his bid to represent the party), he submitted an amicus brief for the group trying to convince the CA Supreme Court that they should be allowed to appeal the decision of Perry v. Schwarzenegger, as the real defendants (the State) had no intention of doing so.
It is not biased, I believe, to categorize his brief as being more of a political tract than a legal argument. He should feel right at home.
Varburg
September 22nd, 2011
As a student of one of the Claremont Colleges, I feel compelled to point out that the Claremont Institute is not affiliated with Claremont Graduate University or Claremont McKenna College or even the Claremont School of Theology. So if this is the first time you’ve heard the word “Claremont”, please don’t think it’s full of nutjobs.
Regan DuCasse
September 22nd, 2011
OIC…they are engaging a legal scholar so now that will make them be all fancy legit and shit, right?
BB himself doesn’t have too many brain cells to rub together, and MG…well, she’s smarter, but not someone who can really argue LEGALLY, as much as she does HISTORICALLY…however much she gets THAT wrong.
Well, we’ve got Olsen and Boise, and as far as civil rights veterans who were in the trenches, we’ve got Rep. John Lewis and several others like them who support equality.
NOM’s record of spokespersons isn’t as attractive in the sense of their debate style or essential charisma.
We can see their strategy for this appointment from a mile away.
And perhaps they’ll never catch up…from a mile away.
justme
September 22nd, 2011
Imagine if these people had to get real jobs. They’d starve. Are they qualified to so much as mop floors?
Leave A Comment