Marriage Opponents Lose Pursuit Of Special Rights

Jim Burroway

October 21st, 2011

It’s been a bad week for the National Organization for Marriage. Two separate courts this week ruled against NOM’s attempt to enshrine a special right to flout laws intended to lend transparency to the electoral process. The first loss came on Monday when Federal Judge Benjamin Settle ruled in Doe v Reed (PDF: 112KB/34 pages) that the state of Washington must disclose the names of citizens who signed the petition putting Referendum 71 on the ballot. Protect Marriage Washington, a NOM affiliate, sued to block the release in a bid to stake a special exemption to Washington’s campaign disclosure laws, claiming that signatories would be subject to threats and harassments. Judge Settle rejected that claim:

While Plaintiffs have not shown serious and widespread threats, harassment, or reprisals against the signers of R-71, or even that such activity would be reasonably likely to occur upon the publication of their names and contact information, they have developed substantial evidence that the public advocacy of traditional marriage as the exclusive definition of marriage, or the expansion of rights for same sex partners, has engendered hostility in this state, and risen to violence elsewhere, against some who have engaged in that advocacy. This should concern every citizen and deserves the full attention of law enforcement when the line gets crossed and an advocate becomes the victim of a crime or is subject to a genuine threat of violence. The right of individuals to speak openly and associate with others who share common views without justified fear of harm is at the very foundation of preserving a free and open society.

The facts before the Court in this case, however, do not rise to the level of demonstrating that a reasonable probability of threats, harassment, or reprisals exists as to the signers of R-71, now nearly two years after R-71 was submitted to the voters in Washington State.

That was on Monday. To bookend the week perfectly, Federal Judge Morrison England, Jr., today issued a bench ruling denying ProtectMarriage.com and NOM’s quest for a special right to withhold the release of campaign finance records related to the passage of Propositon 8 three years ago. Judge England said that the groups failed to prove that they should be exempt from campaign finance laws which are designed to protect the public during expensive initiative campaigns.

Judge England is expected to issue a written ruling later.

enough already

October 21st, 2011

And NOM will ignore it and nothing will be done about it.

Phil

October 21st, 2011

This is all well and good, but isn’t part of the point of campaign disclosure laws to ensure the fairness and transparency of elections and election campaigns as they are happening?

The next time NOM sues to keep donors/signatories secret, I’d like to see a judge order that the election in question be postponed until the matter is settled in court.

Timothy

October 21st, 2011

Well the list is out and I downloaded it to see who from my state donated. Much to my dismay several large donations came from a neighboring city and a bunch from my very own. :( What a sad way to spend your money taking away the rights of others.

Bill T.

October 21st, 2011

I just read an article at The Raw Story that Rick Santorum will die before allowing same sex marriage to become legal in all 50 states. I’d like to know if Rick plans on dying in private or with he televise his demise? And, will his death be on a public access channel like C-SPAN or will it be “pay per view?”

Mudduck

October 21st, 2011

I suspect that NOM’s real terror is that people will see their names who didn’t sign, or who were told that they were signing something else. Paid signature gatherers are seldom scrupulous in their methods. Neither are today’s holy warriors.

Wildwood Guy

October 22nd, 2011

Think Progress reported yesterday that the Referendum 71 signatories has now been halted.

http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2011/10/21/350353/washington-state-halts-release-of-referendum-71-signatories-nom-asks-supporters-to-pray-over-loss/

Not certain how much of a difference this is going to make as there are already 30 DVDs released with the names of those signatories… or why the 9th Circuit would halt the release on the emergency motion. Seems like the train has already left the station. Not much point for the referendum signers to be doing this now, other than costing the State of WA taxpayers more $$.

customartist

October 22nd, 2011

Phil,

Yours is an excellent point. If it is years after NOM influences and wins an initiative, and especially if NOM is not heavily penalized to the point that they do not do the same thing again, then Court Findings are relatively moot.

Until elections and/or initiatives are indeed halted due to improper procedures, we have no political fairness.

John

October 22nd, 2011

If one is not prepared to publically own up to one’s beliefs and convictions, one should not be signing petitions. Anything else is simply cowardice. Also, I can’t think of one instance where a petition signer has been harassed or worse for signing a petition. Any governmental action, which signing petitions such as this are, done in the dark should scare anybody.

customartist

October 22nd, 2011

And Timothy, Please share?

Reed Boyer

October 22nd, 2011

Ah . . . I feel a cool breeze of sanity sweeping the West Coast.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Activists Urge Indonesian Court to Criminalize Homosexuality

Mat Staver Calls for "Civil Disobedience" Over SCOTUS Marriage Decision

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Newsweek's "The Militant Homosexual"

Charlotte Pride Sees Record Attendance, Loud Protests

Australia's Prime Minister Pushes Marriage Equality Plebiscite Off Until Next Year

Texas Federal Judge Blocks Obama Administration's Trans Protections

Something Happened Over The Weekend...

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.