Box Turtle Bulletin

Box Turtle BulletinNews, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
“Now you must raise your children up in a world where that union of man and box turtle is on the same legal footing as man and wife…”
This article can be found at:
Latest Posts

NOM Manufactures Some Outrage

Rob Tisinai

January 31st, 2012

NOM’s blog has a new post up, with its most outrageously outraged headline ever, about NJ Gov. Christie nominating an openly gay man to the state Supreme Court:

Tell Christie to Withdraw Nomination of Pro-SSM Judge For Extremist Views Equating Christianity and Slavery

The basis for their outrage? A letter written by nominee Bruce Harris in 2009 to State Senator Joe Pennacchio about marriage equality:

When I hear someone say that they believe marriage is only between a man and a woman because that’s the way it’s always been, I think of the many “traditions” that deprived people of their civil rights for centuries: prohibitions on interracial marriage, slavery, (which is even provided for in the Bible), segregation, the subservience of women, to name just a few of these “traditions.”

I hope that you consider my request that you re-evaluate your position and, if after viewing the videos, reading Governor Whitman’s letter and thinking again about this issue of civil rights you still oppose same-sex marriage on grounds other than religion I would appreciate it if you you’d explain your position to me. And, if the basis of your opposition is religious, then I suggest that you do what the US Constitution mandates—and that is to maintain a separation between the state and religion.

Maggie Gallagher surprised me by calling this letter “intemperate” in the National Review. Really? The only problem mistake I saw was the comma after “slavery” (this is why no one invites me to parties). It wasn’t until NOMblog picked up the story that I saw her objection.

But is it valid? Does Harris equate Christianity and slavery? Of course not.

The only link between slavery and Christianity in Harris’s letter is a factual parenthetical that is factual which factually points out that the Bible in fact factually provides for slavery. Which is a fact. Harris is just pointing out something that theologians have been grappling with for centuries, including many who created Christian arguments against slavery.  It’s no crime merely to point out that these verses exist (or to warn against a glibly literal application of the Book to public policy). In fact, it’s anti-Biblical to pretend the verses aren’t there.

Harris’s letter does three simple things:

  1. It cautions against using tradition as an argument against marriage equality.
  2. It cautions, on Constitutional grounds, against using religion as an argument against marriage equality.
  3. It politely requests information on what other grounds the good Senator might be opposing marriage equality.

Bruce Harris’s letter is clear, temperate, factual attempt to point out some truths and open an honest dialog. Maybe that’s why Maggie and NOM hate it so.



Tony P
January 31st, 2012 | LINK

NOM will whine forever when there is even a hint of an openly gay person that might have some impact in demolishing their arguments.

January 31st, 2012 | LINK

i have nothing to add just a big PHAT smile!!!

January 31st, 2012 | LINK

“(this is why no one invites me to parties)”

BUT if we are having games at the party I surly would want you on my team Rob! :)

Timothy Kincaid
January 31st, 2012 | LINK

Just the facts, Ma’am. Just the facts.

January 31st, 2012 | LINK

You notice that these people are more concerned about their religion looking bad than wheather it might actually be bad.

January 31st, 2012 | LINK

Gallagher’s NOMBlog post is a specious misrepresentation of Harris’ views in the service of character assassination. What she has against him is his sexual orientation.

As far as Gallagher and NOM are concerned, gays shouldn’t be allowed to become judges even if they offer to recuse themselves from cases concerning same-sex marriage. That’s nothing to do with defending marriage. It’s purely anti-gay. It’s an attack on the idea that LGBT persons should hold high office.

Eric in Oakland
February 1st, 2012 | LINK

I think a good argument could also be made that NOM’s “traditional” marriage is far less Biblical than slavery. Biblical marriage is not monogamous (for men) and is basically a type of slavery itself (for women).

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.