Romney Wins It, Chicago Style

Jim Burroway

March 21st, 2012

One of the most consistent trends in the GOP primaries has been Romney’s strength in urban areas. That matters in Illinois, where Chicago and its greater suburbs (the Illinois portion, at least) make up almost 9 million of Illinois’ 12.8 million statewide. This wasn’t an Illinois primary so much as it was a Chicago primary. In addition, there are another 1.5 million urban-and-suburbanites in Peoria, Champaign-Urbana, Springfield, and the the eastern metro area of St. Louis. With those kind of demographics, should come as no surprise that Romney did very well. Santorum dominated the rural areas, but when that is less than a fifth of the state’s population, that’s not much to draw on. This chart and map from CNN tells the story:

IL
Romney 47%
Santorum 35%
Gingrich 9%
Paul 8%

The exit polls also tell a story. First of all, 98% of the GOP electorate is white?

Okay. Delving deeper, Santorum continues to hold the blue-collar vote, winning among those who have no college education. Unfortunately for hom, they were only 16% of the GOP electorate. He also pulled in the votes from those earning less than $30,000 (only 10% of the GOP electorate). And he wins among those who are “very conservative” and who identify as white born-again Evangelicals, and again he lost among Catholics, including those who attend Mass weekly. And in heavily urban Illinois, all of those factors add up to a convincing win for Romney.

So it’s Romney’s night to celebrate, right? Well, okay, but he still needs to worry that his support is weak. Of the 42% of GOP voters who “have reservations” about their candidate, 54% of them ended up supporting Romney anyway. Another dark cloud: Voters in this exit poll were asked whether they prefer their candidate ultimately wins or the primary ends soon. Of the 66% who want their candidate to win no matter how long it takes, it was very nearly an easy split between Romney and Santorum, with a slight tilt to Romney. But of the 31% who just want it over now, 54% were Romney voters. In other words, those who want this over aren’t getting their wish.

Charles

March 21st, 2012

I will admit that there is no passion for Romney, even though I support him. Why am I for Romney? Someone has to get control to the excessive spending of Congress for which both Democrats and Republicans are currently responsible. I can only pray that Romney will do better than Obama ……….. but really, I am not sure.

Charles

March 21st, 2012

I will add that I think the upcoming election will be extremely ugly and divisive. Let’s all hope that when it is all over we can get on with our lives and get this country back together with a healthy economy and a safer world with brighter future for everyone ………. even us gay folks.

PJB863

March 21st, 2012

You betcha 97% of the GOP electorate in IL is white. However, in those urban areas where Romney won, the GOP tends toward the moderate, “country club” republicans.

Statewide, the GOP is in disarray. Blagojevich was indicted and impeached and the GOP still managed to lose the governor’s race.

Jim Hlavac

March 21st, 2012

Why do you find it surprising that 97% of the Republican primary voters are white? For decades 95% of African-Americans have voted Democrat. They are also very anti-gay. Perhaps that’s why Obama is evolving — 12% of the population overall is Black, 5% or less is gay. They are concentrated in a few districts, we are everywhere.

Latinos, also pretty anti-gay, in Illinois tend not to be citizens yet, so they don’t vote at all.

Jim Burroway

March 21st, 2012

The “other” category includes not just Blacks, but “other,” which typically includes Latinos, Asian-Americans, South Asian-Americans, People from the Middle East, etc. Together, those other groups make up a percentage that is nearly equal to African-Americans in Illinois, but those “others” are not voting in the GOP primary either.

Blake

March 21st, 2012

My goodness Santorum’s clueless. He didn’t even get the folks he thinks he gets. Check that question regarding church attendance.

It’ll be interesting to see that (new?) question with future primary results & in his defense perhaps these polling numbers are skewed because he didn’t make it onto every ballot in Illinois. Still funny.

Timothy Kincaid

March 21st, 2012

In Illinois, the racial breakout is
65% White
15% African American
15% Hispanic – any race
with Asian, Native, and others making up the rest

It would seem that racial minority Illinoisans disproportionately believe that the Democratic Party better represents their interests while white Illinoisans disproportionately believe that the Republican Party better represents their interests.

PJB863

March 21st, 2012

Blake, I too had heard that Santorum did not make it onto every ballot in the state, but I also saw that every county had recorded a sizeable number of votes for him. The part of the ballot that relates to presidential and statewide offices are usually printed at the township or county level (townships outside of the Chicago area are usually six-square mile tracts of land).

It’s possible some of the Chicago area townships (many of which are geographically identical to municipalities) did not have Santorum on the ballots (no pun intended), but they would have been few and far between and likely in areas where republicans were few and far between.

Given the problems with improperly sized ballot forms/scanner settings, I was surprised they were able to get these ballots counted and the results certified as quickly as they did.

PJB863

March 21st, 2012

Tim, if what you said was true, IL would be a red state, but it is not. Democrats have carried IL in every presidential race for the last two decades.

Timothy Kincaid

March 21st, 2012

PJB,

“disproportionately” simply means that the breakout doesn’t follow demographic proportions.

jerry

March 22nd, 2012

I was watching Rachel Maddow last night and she she some very interesting light on the Republican primaries. Illinois had a one box preference question. Pick one candidate for President. I think there were a couple of extra names% on the ballot besides the current active 4. Those are the numbers that were reported and those are the numbers that appear in this article. They are meaningless. To actually vote for a candidate and have that vote get the candidate a delegate at the convention, you had to go to a separate section of the ballot and vote for each individual and alternate signed up as delegates for that candidate.

She also mentioned the voting in the Virgin Islands. Ron Paul got 29% of the vote, Romney got26%, making Paul the clear winner, but he gets 2 of the 9 delegates while Romney gets 7. The party didn’t even try to come up with an explanation for that bit of nonsense.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.