NOM Looking for “Glamorous Non-Cognitive Elites”

Jim Burroway

March 27th, 2012

You know, one of the simpler joys of the NOM document dump is that you can read it and read it and read it — Oh, I don’t know, how many times? — and still overlook gems like this:

Hollywood with its cultural biases is far bigger than we can hope to be. We recognize this. But we also recognize the opportunity – the disproportionate potential impact of proactively seeking to gather and connect a community of artists, athletes, writers, beauty queens and other glamorous non-cognitive elites across national boundaries. (This is applying the Witherspoon and IAV model to non-intellectual elites.)” [Emphasis added by GLAAD]

“Beauty queens.” Does that remind you of anyone?


March 27th, 2012

Haha, I am struggling to understand what “non-cognitive” means, it is merely non-intellectual or is it about getting people to think with their genitals (instinct reaction)?

Van O

March 27th, 2012

Oh my goodness, this is a huge scoop. So NOM’s market is the “non-cognitive elite” — or just the “non-cognitive.”

Don’t want peoples to do no them thar thinkin’!!!

Or: We need some not too bright role models for our base or prospective base to relate to! (Prejean! Palin! Balloon Boy’s dad!)

This seems very damaging to me. But maybe that’s just my brain talking.

Ben in Oakland

March 28th, 2012

Van, if you want to be a no cognitive belief, please believe everything you think.

Ben in Oakland

March 28th, 2012

Ack. That didn’t come out right. Please believe everything you think.

I am so nota cognitive elite at 7 in the morning.


March 28th, 2012

That is just another statement revealing NOM’s breathtaking level of inanity.

Chuck Mielke

March 29th, 2012

It’s an interesting statement of a rather scary strategy. While very few people are real intellectuals, everybody believes that s/he is “no dummy.” Yet, the NOM strategy recognizes that so many non-dummies believe what attractive or popular people say. The distinction between attractiveness/popularity and leadership is very narrow. I want to believe that the US population is, as a whole, catching on to the blatant fear-mongering of the extreme right, and they’ve begun to resist it. This move by NOM to recruit “the beauty elite” for their propaganda may be the beginning of the right’s recognition that fear-mongering has lost its power. (On the other hand, the anti-equality cartoons used in Anchorage suggest otherwise.)

Graham Shevlin

March 30th, 2012

What the hell is a “non-cognitive celebrity”? Is this lobbying-speak for “absolute moron” or merely “useful idiot”? Inquiring minds want to know…

Timothy Kincaid

April 1st, 2012

My daydream interview is that someone ask America Ferrera about the marriage equality and have her say, “those who oppose gay marriage have never tried to explain their position to me. I dont know if I’m not glamorous enough or too cognitive.”

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.