The Daily Agenda for Friday, May 24
Boy Scouts of America Votes To Allow Gay Members, Retains Ban On Gay Leaders
Nevada House votes to reverse marriage ban
The Daily Agenda for Thursday, May 23
It's Not the Principle, It's the Prejudice
Congratulations Mitch!
Gay Couples Excluded from Immigration Bill Markup
How To Spot A Swivel-Eyed Loon
Featured Reports
What Are Little Boys Made Of?
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
David Benkof: Behind the Mask
At first glance, David Benkof appears to be a young gay man who believes that same-sex marriage will damage the institution of marriage, that there are better options for gay couples than marriage, that the community should join him in prioritizing other more pressing issues, and that the marriage discussion is harming the efforts of gay couples in red states to get recognition for their unions. He also claims that he’s a gay columnist, that he speaks for an influential collection of gay thinkers, and that he is part of the gay and lesbian community and that he shares our goals and dreams. But none of that is true.
“Repeat After Me”: The Reparative Therapy Echo Chamber
The April 2008 edition of the pay-to-publish vanity journal Psychological Reports featured a new report from NARTH. Written by NARTH president A. Dean Byrd, past president Joseph Nicolosi, and Richard W. Potts, the report carries the unwieldy but self-descriptive title, “Clients perceptions of how reorientation therapy and self-help can promote changes in sexual orientation.” While the title describes what the authors meant to show — how clients describe the benefits of reparative therapy — the report itself actually illustrates something very different: the ex-gay movement’s remarkable ability to instill an almost robot-like parroting of ex-gay rhetoric among their clients.
Testing the Premise: Is MRSA The New Gay Plague?
The Toronto Star said that a new study “discover[ed] a new strain” of a super-bug “hitting gay men.” Headlines in Britain screamed, “Flesh-eating bug strikes San Francisco’s gay community,” and anti-gay extremists across America spread the alarm that gays were introducing another plague into “the general population.” But there was a small problem with all of this: None of it is true!
Paul Cameron’s World
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don't miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
Review: The Gay Report
When Karla Jay and Allan Young published The Gay Report in 1979, it quickly a favorite source of statistics for many anti-gay extremists. But before you accepts these statistic at face value, you should examine the inner workings of this survey very carefully. What you learn might surprise you.
Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Richard Rush
November 8th, 2012 | LINK
“His law school teaches his law students to ignore the law — and even counsel clients to break the law — in favor of “God’s Law.””
Is his law school accredited? If so, why? Is there a special enhanced accreditation classification for schools that follow God’s Law?
Edwin in Colorado
November 8th, 2012 | LINK
Well it looks like all the religious radicals got stepped on on Tuesday.
That is a good thing to hear too.
Several of the people down here in my neck of the country were upset. But I figured at least the LGBT people won’t be set back 40 years.
We have fought hard for the rights we were born with and still have to fight for.
All the hate preachers are finally finding out what it is like for things to go to the the fighters and the real believers in GOD.
Bill T.
November 8th, 2012 | LINK
A law school that teaches there were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark isn’t much of a law school. They are all just whambulance chasers anyway.
SharonB
November 8th, 2012 | LINK
He is a loser. Not a sore loser; just a loser.
MattNYC
November 9th, 2012 | LINK
“We might be a Bonhoeffer in Nazi Germany”
Oh. Please.
Since they raised it first, I am not violating Godwin’s Law by stating that Bonhoeffer gave his life defying the Christian-Aryan Third Reich, standing up against injustice perpetrated by those who claimed to be God-ordained to exterminate anyone they didn’t like. Bonhoeffer and Niemoller are spinning fast in their graves.
Snowman
November 9th, 2012 | LINK
I sure wouldn’t want him or any lawyer who graduated from his “law school” representing ME in court!
Steve
November 9th, 2012 | LINK
There is an awesome bit in the Miller lawsuit when they listed the people they are suing. It says “Liberty University – a purported educational institution”
Regan DuCasse
November 9th, 2012 | LINK
They are accredited. But that doesn’t mean their graduates are SUCCESSFUL lawyers.
Regent U is trying to game Washington, D.C by having it’s graduates get jobs and put themselves in higher and higher levels of influential positions there. They are really trying to have SCOTUS be who they think will favor their Christian ideals.
Disregarding the fact that SCOTUS has only two Jewish people on it. The rest ARE Christian.
The ADF…oh s’cuse me, the AACD, Alliance Against Christian Defamation: takes on cases involving Christians getting in trouble for their anti gay activities just about exclusively.
It seems that the client focus is SO narrow, that it’s a wonder this law group can stay afloat.
Pretty much all of their cases have been lost and their complaint is because of activist judges, or homosexuals being highly placed and influential in the outcomes.
As I said, their ONLY cases always have something to do with gay people and nothing else.
And they do a work that involves filing briefs, or demanding some kind of stays or court trials without video.
They sued when they found out that Walker’s court had used part of the 8 trial in a lecture, which they said exposed witnesses that shouldn’t have been.
They truly strain at gnats sometimes.
But they almost never win. What usually happens is they just delay the inevitable until they think no one will notice what’s actually happened.
Timothy Kincaid
November 9th, 2012 | LINK
“Disregarding the fact that SCOTUS has only two Jewish people on it. The rest ARE Christian.”
Actually, there are no Evangelical Christians on the Supreme Court, or even any mainline Christians. No Protestants at all.
All are either Jewish (Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan) or Roman Catholic (Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, Thomas, Sotomayor).
Regan DuCasse
November 10th, 2012 | LINK
You’re right Tim, that’s why Pat Robertson wants to replace SCOTUS with the fundamentalist kind.
PLAINTOM
November 10th, 2012 | LINK
I have no problem with him living his own life as his religious interpretation guides him but I have a huge problem with him attempting to impose his personal religious beliefs on me. By the way is he wearing mixed fibers, stone the bastard.
Donny D.
November 11th, 2012 | LINK
TImothy Kincaid wrote,
When Thomas first got first got unto the SCOTUS, wasn’t he a Charmismatic Episcopalian (or something like that)?
Leave A Comment