Ugandan Religious NGO Lays Off Staff After US Aid Cuts

Jim Burroway

August 18th, 2014

The Ugandan opposition magazine Observer reports that the Inter-Religious Council of Uganda (IRCU), which is composed of members from the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council, Roman Catholic, Anglican, Orthodox and Seventh Day Adventist churches, has had its funding withdrawn for its HIV/AIDS program by the U.S. Agency for International Development over the IRCU’s support for the Anti-Homosexuality Act. Funding from the European Union was also withdrawn, forcing the IRCU to lay off its entire paid staff.

The multi-denominational organization was this month forced to lay off all staff after USAID abruptly ended its financial support worth $34.5m (Shs 89.7bn). This funding accounted for about 90 per cent of IRCU’s resource envelope. The local organization says it is a victim of its anti-gay stance, which the donor finds unacceptable, although some sources claim IRCU failed to meet some of USAID’s rigorous accountability procedures. Suspension of funding was communicated to IRCU in a June 26 letter by USAID Country Director Lislie Reed. She told the religious body that their partnership was being terminated effective July 31. According to IRCU General Secretary Joshua Kitakule, the funding was supposed to end in December 2014, but USAID had agreed to fund another follow-on project.

…Disagreement between the Americans and IRCU started when the religious leaders came out publicly to support the December 20, 2013 passing of the now-annulled Anti-Homosexuality Act. Religious leaders were vocal in their support for the law that criminalises homosexuality, and even organized an event at Kololo to celebrate after President Museveni endorsed it. At the time, the NGO’s budget had a balance of $7m (Shs 18.2bn), which was to cover the one year remaining on the funding calendar. This was cut to $2.35m (Shs 6.1bn), forcing IRCU to lay off at least 30 of its 55-member workforce. That number has further been reduced to just five after USAID terminated the partnership. The remaining employees are now not salaried.

Ben in oakland

August 18th, 2014

They can cooperate with each other, as each group rejects the totality of the theology of the others. At the same time, they can agree on “get the gays”.

It’s almost enough to make you think that this has nothing to do whatsoever with “sincere religious beliefs”. It’s a sickness, one that will cost even more lives.

FYoung

August 18th, 2014

Funding should never have been granted to them.

Governments should never fund churches, ever; nothing good ever comes from forcing people to fund churches through taxes.

Any group that is ideologically opposed to effective AIDS prevention was never qualified to receive AIDS funding. There was no excuse for Obama to keep funding these groups that are committed only to their own enrichment and domination.

Richard Rush

August 18th, 2014

FYoung said “Governments should never fund churches, ever.” I certainly agree. But unfortunately, in the United States virtually all churches receive generous de facto government funding via federal, state, and local tax exemptions. And, to compensate, the rest of us are forced to pay higher taxes than we would otherwise. Non-religious people, such as myself, are being forced to provide funding for churches.

Mary in Austin

August 18th, 2014

Good.

jerry

August 18th, 2014

It has always been my contention that religious organizations should never get public funding for charitable work unless they are held to strict accounting standards for how the money is spent.

I would be very surprised to learn that none of the organizations involved in the NGO had not spent a lot of effort to raise funds for this worthwhile charity and didn’t bother to tell the people they were dunning for contributions that only ten cents on the dollar would go to the actual work of the charity.

I would also be very surprised if most of the people supposedly providing services were not hip deep or more in proselytizing for their own cult.

Mark F.

August 18th, 2014

“But unfortunately, in the United States virtually all churches receive generous de facto government funding via federal, state, and local tax exemptions. And, to compensate, the rest of us are forced to pay higher taxes than we would otherwise.”

Many non-profit organizations receive tax exemptions, not just churches.

Erp

August 18th, 2014

Other non-profit organizations are required to file tax returns showing how the money is spent. In the US churches and their counterparts in other religions do not have to reveal any financial information (with a few exceptions such as when filing for bankruptcy). Note that some do provide their financial details anyway (notably some of the ones where the regular members actually have a say in the organization).

Bose in St. Peter MN

August 19th, 2014

“A senior member of staff who has been laid off told The Observer that USAID was maintaining support for all the beneficiaries of the projects previously executed by IRCU but now under a different framework.

It just seems reasonable that USAID has managed this transition carefully so that the intended goal of the IRCU’s funding will continue to be met. Some of the laid-off staff no doubt have experience that would make them good hires for the new org.

So, the employment levels remain the same. The benefits to clients may face hiccups in the transition, but should stabilize soon enough. The only losers are the execs/managers who were happy to gum up their humanitarian mission with anti-humanitarian words and work.

(Reminds me of Catholic Charities in Illinois and elsewhere screaming about being “shut down” when many agencies actually just cut their ties to the church, or the fair-minded professionals were happy to be snapped up by the orgs that started or expanded to fill the void. The only harm was to bishops’ egos at being blocked from wedging themselves between kids and the parents they needed.)

Good outcome.

Hunter

August 21st, 2014

Catholic Charities in Illinois dropped their adoption services when the state said comply with nondiscrimination laws in placement or lose your funding, which was most of their budget. A number of organizations, both secular and religious, stepped in to take over CC’s cases. Strangely enough, those organizations, even the religiously affiliated ones, were happy to comply with the law.

Strangely enough, this only became an issue for CC after the civil unions law was passed, which gave gay couples the same standing as married straight couples on the state level.

As for the IRCU, maybe it’s time they learned one of life’s basic lessons: actions have consequences. (Which, to hear any number of “Christians” tell it, violates their religious beliefs.)

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

FBI Reports Massive Surge In Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes in 2015

Baptist General Convention of Texas Warns Churches in Dallas and Austin Over LGBT Inclusion

Trump Selects Alt-Right Nationalist As "Chief Strategist and Senior Counselor"

WITNESS: Bean Blossom, Indiana

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.