May 23rd, 2015
Marriage equality opponents have been almost uniformly graceful in their concession statements in the wake of today’s landslide in Ireland. David Quinn of the Iona Institute tweeted “Congratulations to the Yes side. Well Done.” The Iona Institute’s official statement congratulating the Yes campaigners described their win as “a handsome victory0.” Another group, Mothers and Fathers Matter offered their “warm congratulations” as well. All the major groups expressed their typical concerns going forward, but you get the idea of the tenor of their reactions to today’s vote.
On this side of the pond however, things are a bit different, with the usual suspects blowing a gasket over the Irish vote. NOM’s Brian Brown, for example, sent out a statement which blamed the loss on ” the utter abandonment of principle by every political party in the nation, all of whom endorsed the referendum” and what he claimed to be an “intense harassment of any group or individual who spoke out in opposition to the referendum.” Also —
“Despite this, millions of Irish citizens stood to vote to uphold the truth of marriage as the union of one man and one woman.
Millions? Try just 734,300. The “millions” were on the yes side, at 1,201,607. Idiot.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Ben in oakland
May 23rd, 2015
As with everything else, Brian Brown can’t possibly recognize reality if it bit him on the ass.
In this case, he is redefining 742,000 as “millions.”
Eric Payne
May 23rd, 2015
We all knew Brian Browns in childhood. When told to share something, didn’t we all know that one kid whose idea of share was: “One for you, and one for me. One more for you, and two for me. One for you, and three for me…”?
Eric M
May 23rd, 2015
Give him a break. At least he had the wherewithal to change “Washington” to “Irish” before he hit send.
gar
May 23rd, 2015
The graciousness of the losing side in Ireland has actually been very inspirational. I’m hoping that their fears will soon be allayed and they’ll see that there is nothing to fear at all.
Neil
May 23rd, 2015
To Mr Brown, campaigning for your cause in a referendum is, “intense harassment of any group or individual who spoke out in opposition to the referendum.â€
Note the wording, “opposition to the referendum,” as if the referendum itself was some cunning contrivance of the marriage equality side and the self-styled traditionalists never wanted it.
Mr Brown has often demanded the issue of same sex marriage be put to a popular vote, but it appears his idea of the democratic process is that everyone who has a different opinion to him should just shut up. Only those who agree with him are permitted to endorse their side.
For all his bluster about repecting the will of the people, as his wording reveals, his respect is reserved if the popular will is against him. If Mr Brown disagrees with you, that’s democracy. If you disagree with him, that’s “intense harassment.” And if the referendum is carried in the affirmative, he’s opposed to the referendum.
Joseph Singer
May 23rd, 2015
Don’t be too hard on Bri. He’s really worried that his job of being mean to people who are for same sex marriage is going to lead to his organization folding and he won’t have his six figure income to pay for his pool and afternoon massages.
Bose
May 23rd, 2015
How pissed off is Mr. Brown that his Irish colleagues wanted no visible ties to him, funded not a single speaking tour for him there, and now wash their hands of his vitriolic style and substance?
He dismisses the 84% of the population who self-identify as Catholics (like he does) as “secularized,” apparently because the current-day Church finds itself incapable of drawing many of them to the pews.
It’s just got to burn that he is left stomping his feet, muttering under his breath, smoke billowing from his ears, while his erstwhile (maybe-never) friends offer poised, graceful, arguably Christ-like responses.
Leo88
May 24th, 2015
The NOM/Brian Brown script.
If same sex marriage comes by way of court ruling it’s judicial activism.
If it comes through legislative votes and procedures, as it did in NY, the politician are all corrupt.
If it comes through popular vote in a historically Catholic nation it’s due to an abandonment of values and the “harassment” of the opposition.
What it is, is never a failure of his side to mount an honest and effective argument.
First it was mendacious nonsense about the ending of heterosexual marriage. When that was shown to be pretty thin gruel it became all about the children. They cooked up some phony social science in an attempt to “prove” their point. That didn’t go well. Then it became about the “ideal” environment for raising children which has never had any bearing on the issuance of marriage licenses. Now we’re in the “religious freedom”, think-of-the-bakers-and-florists stage.
Richard Everitt
May 24th, 2015
Quite frankly supporters of marriage equality should be grateful to NOM. They have been pathetically incompetent, their aggressive fundraising soaked up money which might have gone to more effective organizations, and their Proposition 8 “victory” created a backlash which drove the Mormons out of the fight. Thanks to NOM, marriage equality throughout the U.S. will probably arrive five to ten years earlier than would otherwise have been the case. Personally some were good people following their church’s teachings, while others were scum, but none of them achieved much toward their stated goals. Proposition 8, for example, cost their side over a hundred million dollars – and survived less than five years. That is not a wise use of resources.
Richard Everitt
May 24th, 2015
Quite frankly supporters of marriage equality should be grateful to NOM. They have been pathetically incompetent, their aggressive fundraising soaked up money which might have gone to more effective organizations, and their Proposition 8 “victory†created a backlash which drove the Mormons out of the fight. Thanks to NOM, marriage equality throughout the U.S. will probably arrive five to ten years earlier than would otherwise have been the case. Personally some were good people following their churchs’ teachings, while others were scum, but none of them achieved much toward their stated goals. Proposition 8, for example, cost their side over a hundred million dollars – and survived less than five years. That is not a wise use of resources.
Regan DuCasse
May 24th, 2015
Brian Brown can be counted on to BAD MOUTH everyone and every process, no matter how legally or competently they went about their business.
Whether they were gay allies, or politically neutral.
The justices, the courts, the legislatures, the voters: when they actually took into account, the reading of the Constitution, and not the reading of the Bible as the standard of law and their decisions, Brown predictably said nasty and untrue things that would burn whatever bridges might be necessary regarding other issues.
He’s not a very bright man, is he?
Paul Douglas
May 25th, 2015
I agree with Joseph. While I think Brown a bully and a blowhard as a well as a romanist convert (converts seem to always be the truest believers), he also sees a good $$$ gig that can’t be on life-support forever. He’s gotta be concerned about eventual ca$h flow so he’s demonstrating loyalty to the cause and doubling-down in zealotry. Good for his resume when the next über-conservative catholick-funded cause célèbre comes along.
“It’s difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it.â€
Upton Sinclair
Nathaniel
May 25th, 2015
The whole piece is worth a read. Brown is certainly not as gracious as his Irish counterparts, but I don’t think they expected to win. If they had, they would not have conceded until every vote had been counted. Brown, on the other hand, seems to think he speaks for God, and therefore, he is shocked when he fails.
What I found most interesting in his rant was that he actually stuck to his guns. One of his “I’m sorry we lost, but…” statements was the unsurprising “at least the people of Ireland got to vote” argument, aimed at SCOTUS’ impending decision. I’m sure he would feel bitter about losing the popular vote, but he has at least conceded that he got what he wanted simply by having gay rights up for popular vote.
Right after his enhanced estimate of the Irish “no” vote, Brown also took succor in the fact that marriage equality is only in “less than 10%” of the world’s nations. He also seem to take succor in the fact that most of those nations are “in the West,” as if the Middle Eastern and African nations that still threaten LGBT people with death or life imprisonment are real models for us to follow.
This reminds me, we are due a new marriage-equality-by-nation count. I’m not sure how Brown got to 18 unless he was counting the US, Mexico, the UK, and some other partially-there nations, and/or counting Scotland separately from the UK.
Nathaniel
May 25th, 2015
actually, Wikipedia seems to have a pretty good entry on the matter. The country count is actually higher than I expected (21, if you count the US, the UK, and Mexico). Still not sure about Brown’s number, but it isn’t as far off as I thought.
Nathaniel
May 25th, 2015
Sorry, meant to include this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage
Priya Lynn
May 25th, 2015
To be part of the country count there needs to be marriage equality in the entire country so the count is 18.
Boo
May 26th, 2015
Brian is just using ex-gay math.
Hunter
May 26th, 2015
On the marriage count, I come up with 18 not counting Finland (effective 2016) or Slovenia (threats of referendum), nor the U.S. or Mexico. Four others recognize marriages performed elsewhere.
As for letting the people vote, under American law marriage to the person of one’s choice is a fundamental right, and so not subject to popular vote. (Yes, that means all those state constitutional amendments were never legitimate to start with.) Of course, Brown, like the rest of Anti-Gay, Inc., doesn’t really like the foundational principles of this country.
Hunter
May 26th, 2015
Oops — just double checked — same-sex marriage goes into effect in Finland in 2017.
Richard Rush
May 26th, 2015
Now that TLC may have a time-slot becoming available, let’s launch a real reality show: 18 Countries and Counting. (I’m not joshing.)
Ben in oakland
May 26th, 2015
I sincerely hope you’re not joshing. After all you are a respectable gay man of a certain age, and should not have any interest at all in underage girls.
Nathaniel
May 26th, 2015
Thanks, Hunter and PL. If we don’t count Ireland, Slovenia, or Finland, who haven’t actually had marriages start yet, or US, UK, and Mexico who all have one or more states that do not provide marriages, then the highest count I can find is 16 (remember that Northern Ireland, which is part of the UK, does not provide marriage equality yet). It gets even lower if you drop countries like the Netherlands and Denmark, which have minor territories that are technically part of the kingdom, but which are not included under the laws that enacted marriage equality.
Spunky
May 26th, 2015
Richard Rush wins today. That is absolutely hilarious.
David Holt
May 26th, 2015
I notice that Brown’s statement about “millions” standing in line has been quietly corrected on the NOM blog as at 27 May.
jerry
May 28th, 2015
Millions? Try just 734,300. The “millions†were on the yes side, at 1,201,607.
B B ie. the bumbling bigot has never let facts get in the way of his bullshit.
Leave A Comment