Schadenfreude Alert, Part 2: NOM Is Apoplectic

Jim Burroway

August 4th, 2010

 Brian Brown’s and Maggie Gallagher’s heads explode:

“Big surprise! We expected nothing different from Judge Vaughn Walker, after the biased way he conducted this trial,” said Brian Brown, President of NOM. “With a stroke of his pen, Judge Walker has overruled the votes and values of 7 million Californians who voted for marriage as one man and one woman. This ruling, if allowed to stand, threatens not only Prop 8 in California but the laws in 45 other states that define marriage as one man and one woman.”

“Never in the history of America has a federal judge ruled that there is a federal constitutional right to same sex marriage. The reason for this is simple – there isn’t!” added Brown.

“The ‘trial’ in San Francisco in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger case is a unique, and disturbing, episode in American jurisprudence. Here we have an openly gay (according to the San Francisco Chronicle) federal judge substituting his views for those of the American people and of our Founding Fathers who I promise you would be shocked by courts that imagine they have the right to put gay marriage in our Constitution. We call on the Supreme Court and Congress to protect the people’s right to vote for marriage,” stated Maggie Gallagher, Chairman of the Board of NOM.

Timothy Kincaid

August 4th, 2010

Oh I love that “trial” has scare quotes around it.

Burr

August 4th, 2010

Here we have an openly gay (according to the San Francisco Chronicle) federal judge substituting his views for those of the American people and of our Founding Fathers who I promise you would be shocked by courts that imagine they have the right to put gay marriage in our Constitution.

The views of the American people are not monolithic. They are divided pretty evenly on this issue and thus this is a place for judges to step in. Stop pretending this is 100% against 0%.

The Founding Fathers would be shocked that governments are regulating marriage at all. They didn’t need marriage licenses. Where is heterosexual marriage in the Constitution?

beachewtoy75

August 4th, 2010

“Here we have an openly gay (according to the San Francisco Chronicle) federal judge substituting his views for those of the American people and of our Founding Fathers who I promise you would be shocked by courts that imagine they have the right to put gay marriage in our Constitution. ”

1. I was wondering how long it would take to point out that Walker was gay.

2. The founding fathers would be shocked by a black president and a female Sec of State, too!

Ryan

August 4th, 2010

That’s nothing compared to how shocked our Founding Fathers would be by the internet. Or cars! Man, they would be terrified of cars! I bet they’d think cars were some sort of scary devil machines! And let’s not even get into allowing women to be the governor of a large state near the Russian border! That’s nuts! Man, I bet there’s literally thousands of things our Founding Fathers would be shocked by. Maggie should go write a book about them or something; it would finally be a constructive use of her time.

Lindoro Almaviva

August 4th, 2010

Please, we all knew they were getting ready to loose the trial and were looking for reasons to play the victim card.

People like this make me sick and bring the worst in me so i am going to take a breath and count to 10.

Greg

August 4th, 2010

“With a stroke of his pen…”

Uh, actually, Brian, it was 138 pages worth of strokes of his pen.

Dustin

August 4th, 2010

I don’t understand why they keep harping on the fact that Walker is gay. If he was an Evangelical, would they have asked him to step down because his religious beliefs would have presented a conflict of interest? What about a judge who’s a member of the NRA presiding over a gun rights case…do they think that should be disallowed as well?

Ryan

August 4th, 2010

No Dustin, because those judges would rule correctly.

Mark F.

August 4th, 2010

I don’t mind that someone disagrees with this ruling. However, the totally hysterical tone of the anti-gay people is mind boggling … you’d think they just legalized child molestation.

cd

August 4th, 2010

I don’t mind that someone disagrees with this ruling. However, the totally hysterical tone of the anti-gay people is mind boggling … you’d think they just legalized child molestation.

It’s being widely observed today that Walker’s verdict and their own failure to mount a serious defense has annihilated the remaining credibility of their argument. That credibility has been eroding all along, as ever more pieces of it have become untenable. Walker sifted through the wreckage and it’s 138 pages of showing his earnest labor to discover, but not finding, any substantive or respectworthy basis to their claims.

It’s a lot like federal judge John Paul Stevens’s verdict in Kitzmiller v Dover in 2004 that annihilated the Intelligent Design game. Everyone knew that one wasn’t a close call, but the verdict knocked out every leg the ID people had to stand on. It’s not that Stevens even intended to, it’s just that it was all rot and prevarication below the very thin surface on their side. They whined pitifully but didn’t even bother to appeal it.

John in MN

August 5th, 2010

I hate it when Brown says there’s no right to gay marriage in the constitution. If he actually READ the thing, he would notice that there’s no right to marriage PERIOD!

So I ask Brian: What gives you special treatment?

jOHN

August 5th, 2010

“We expected nothing different” from Maggie and Brian….

TampaZeke

August 5th, 2010

I get so tired of hearing them make statements that would lead one to believe that an overwhelming majority of Californians have spoken out loudly in their opposition to marriage.

Even if we were to convince ourselves that 100% of Californians VOTED, their claim would be inflated. A small majority of those WHO VOTED opposed marriage equality.

The fact of the matter is about 16% of Californians voted to oppose marriage equality and 15% voted to support it. When you look at these FACTUAL numbers they don’t look so convincing for the marriage opponents.

The news media needs to point this out each and every time they make their bogus claim.

Michael McKeon

August 5th, 2010

And never in history has the right to marry been given to an American and then taken away by vote based on Mormon and biblical b*ll sh*t. But little missy Brian left that part out. I count the days til he is found with a bag of meth and a rent boy.

Peace,
Michael McKeon

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 2006: NARTH Official Recommends Peer Shaming for Gender-Variant Elementary School Children

Today In History, 2007: Sen. Larry Craig's Airport Mens Room Bust Revealed

Born On This Day, 1961: Tom Ford

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Emphasis Mine

Today In History, 1954: Miami Mayor Calls for Anti-Gay Crackdown

Today In History, 1995: GOP Presidential Candidate Sen. Bob Dole Returns Donation from Log Cabin Republicans

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.