The Daily Agenda for Monday, November 16

Jim Burroway

November 16th, 2015

EMPHASIS MINE:

Source: Colourbox.com

I can go years without remembering a dream.  A couple of months ago, I had one that I don’t think I’ll ever forget. It was no ordinary dream. It was a three-parter, like three scenes of the same play. All three featured my Dad, who died more than thirty years ago while I was in college. Let me tell you about Part 1. Here, Dad isn’t just some ordinary guy from a modest Northeastern rural Ohio family, but a world-famous writer whose masterpiece got him exiled from his homeland (!). It begins at an airport. Dad and I had just gotten off the plane, arriving at his home country after the government announced it had lifted his banishment and would allow him to return. He brought me with him to introduce me to his family and show me his village. But he was very worried. He feared that his country’s invitation for him to return might have been a ruse. He feared being abducted, arrested or even assassinated. But he was determined to see it through. After we made our way through the airport, he stopped and pointed through the crowd to a set of glass exit doors beyond, doors which led out of the airport to an elevated pedestrian walkway beyond. He leaned in to me and said in a very urgent voice, “If anything’s going to happen, it’ll be after I go through those doors.” The next thing I knew, he took off ahead of me and through the doors.  I ran to catch up. Fortunately, our fears weren’t realized, and I joined him onto the tree-lined walkway out of the airport.

The dream segued into parts two and three, which took place in his village with friends and relatives. Those parts were similarly extraordinary, to me at least, and after I awoke, I spent a few minutes in bed feeling grateful for having had a chance to spend some time with Dad, even if it was only in a dream. Now I’m not one of those people who places a lot of stock in dreams. They aren’t messages from beyond, nor are they omens or predictions of things to come. Dreams are simply the product of one’s own mind. And if they reveal anything, it’s the state of one’s mind at the time of the dream. And clearly, the first part of the dream spoke to me as being about transitions, which have been much on my mind lately. In the next four to six months, I hope to undergo a pretty big one. Over the past year or more, I’ve been working incredibly long hours at my full-time job, and that has left very little time for much of anything outside of work. (The blog has obviously suffered as a result.) But if all goes well, I hope to be able to take early retirement next year, and I may be able to establish that 2016 retirement date in the next several weeks.

It’s appropriate for Dad to appear in this dream, as he has a lot to do with my pending retirement. He often talked about what he wanted to do when he retired. Part of his plan was to sell everything and live in an R.V., and become the beach bum he always wanted to be. The other part of his plan was for his four sons to move to different, interesting parts of the country so he could pull into their driveways and plug in for a few weeks. (I did my part; I moved to Tucson). But he died at 48, and he never got to see retirement. I’ll be 55 soon, and I’m not guaranteed a 56. So he is why I’ve been saving for this day since my early twenties.

As excited as I am at the prospect, I also have to admit that it’s pretty scary — the idea that I will no longer be working, will no longer have a paycheck, and will *really* be on my own in ways I’ve never been before. It’s actually quite daunting, even though I’ve been preparing for this for thirty years.  And yet, I have so many plans and so many things I want to do. Among them, I want to re-energize this blog and take it places it (and I) have never gone before. There are so many stories out there, which means there are so many things I want to experience, so many people I want to talk to, and so many things I want to be able to tell you about. And in the next several months, I should have the freedom to do all that. Meanwhile, Dad’s words to me in that dream have become something of a personal motto lately because if anything’s going to happen, it’ll be after I go through those doors.

TODAY’S AGENDA is brought to you by:

From Dallas Voice, November 9, 1984, page2 12-13. (Source.)

From Dallas Voice, November 9, 1984, page2 12-13. (Source.)

TODAY IN HISTORY:
10 YEARS AGO: Box Turtle Bulletin Goes Live: 2005. It’s ironic, in a way, that when I first brought BTB to life ten years ago, I had no intention for it to become a blog. In fact, I said so right there: “This isn’t a blog.” My vision back then was to have a more or less static web site with long-form articles exploring the many ways anti-gay activists were blatantly misrepresenting social science research to further their aims. That was a pretty big deal ten years ago, because anti-gay individuals (like Paul Cameron, James Dobson and Timothy Daley), and organizations like the Family “Research” Council and Focus On the Family had long ago discovered that if they put out a lot of propaganda with scholarly-looking footnotes citing articles in professional journals, they could pretty much say whatever they wanted, confident in the knowledge that nobody was going to bother spending countless hours looking up those footnotes and discovering that what they were saying was absolutely not true at all.

I was that nobody, and the exercise of looking up those footnotes was an important part of my own coming out five years earlier because I, as someone who valued science, had at one time believed that what they worked so hard to research and document in footnotes had to have been true. Obviously, discovering that virtually everything they said was a lie outraged me on many levels. Not only because they were supposedly godly people who valued truth, but it outraged me as a scientist, as someone who considers data integrity as sacrosanct. What they were doing we would call fraud or malpractice in any other profession. If engineers treated their data the way these anti-gay activists did, we’d see sewage coming out of our water taps, planes falling out of the sky, nuclear power plants exploding, and bridges collapsing left and right. If we ran science the way they did, doctors would still be treating diseases with Clark Stanley’s Snake Oil Liniment.

But more important than all that — beyond the ethics of how you treat other people’s data — was the overarching ethics was how you treat other people. These activists were causing real damage to families, communities and to the world at large, while presenting themselves as scholarly experts whose only concern was what the data was supposedly telling them.

And so those abuses of social science research were at the heart of what I wanted to get at, and this web site had a terrific start in exposing some of the most egregious abuses. (This exposé helped to thwart a Bush nominee for Surgeon General. And more recently, BTB was the first web site to expose Dr. Mark Regnerus’s fraudulent study.)

And so here’s the thing. When a web site starts to gain readers, and those readers and writer (and later, writers) start to interact, then it’s no longer just a web site under the control of the site’s publisher. Instead, it becomes a community, and that community is what informs where the web site goes from there. And so somewhere along the way, BTB became a blog. Not because I wanted it to become one, but because somehow that’s just what happened. Meanwhile, we branched out quite a bit, particularly with our reporting on the unfolding events in Uganda following the calamitous 2009 conference in Kampala put on by three American anti-gay extremists (BTB was the first western outlet to report on that conference more than a week before it took place) which led to the introduction of the so-called “Kill-the-Gays” Anti-Homosexuality Bill in that nation’s parliament.  We also brought you the tragic story of five-year-old Kirk Murphy, who was treated at UCLA for “cross-gender disturbance” — their term for effeminate homosexuality — by a young grad student who would later become an prominent and infamous anti-gay activist. This story, and many others like it told elsewhere on the inter webs, have provided the powerful incentives for several state legislatures to prohibit licensed professionals from providing sexual orientation change therapies for non-adult patients.

Since starting this web site, our opponents have been forced to change their tactics. They no longer expend as much energy misrepresenting social science research as they once did, simply because there are now too many people — like those of us here at BTB, and others as well — who are onto them and can call them out. It helped, too, that researchers themselves have been more willing to speak up when they’ve seen their research misrepresented. Some tried to give their own brand of social science one last shot, but that also failed. Miserably. So miserably that our opponents quickly abandoned that approach. So anti-gay activists were forced to shift their tactics. They’ve also been losing. There’s that too. BTB didn’t cause all of that to happen, or even most of it, not by a long shot. But we did play our part in the small ways that we could, and I take some measure of personal satisfaction in that.

So where does BTB go from here? If I tried to guess, my guess would probably be as accurate as the first time I tried to predict what this thing would be. But I do plan to rejuvenate the site– to blow the stink off, as my grandmother would have put it. The site’s coding needs a complete overhaul — it’s hopelessly antiquated — but more to the point, the blog’s editorial direction will almost certainly change. So much has changed in the past ten years, in the progress of our community, as well as for me personally. This site will need reflect all that. But I also don’t want to forget why BTB came into being in the first place, because some things still haven’t changed. Not enough, anyway, and certainly not everywhere.

TODAY’S BIRTHDAY:
Paula Vogel: 1951. “I only write about things that directly impact my life.” Vogel says. “If people get upset, it’s because the play is working.” It certainly worked for How I Learned to Drive, which explores control and manipulation through the issues of misogyny, pedophilia and incest through the relatively simple metaphor of driving. She won the 1998 Pulitzer Prize for Drama for it.

Her first major play, The Baltimore Waltz was a comedy about AIDS, in 1990, when AIDS still couldn’t be joked about much. Hot’N Throbbing (1994) looks at the intersection of porn and domestic violence, while The Mineola Twins (1999) portrays women’s experience over the previous thirty years through the eyes of identical twins. The plays are deadly serious, though many of them are also comedies or at least incorporate comedy in them. They are also, as theater theorist Jill Dolan wrote, “at once creative, highly imaginative, and brutally honest.”

Vogel says that her family, especially her brother who died of AIDS in 1988, play a very important role in her plays. “In every play, there are a couple of places where I send a message to my late brother Carl. Just a little something in the atmosphere of every play to try and change the homophobia in our world.” She is also a teacher, having led the graduate playwriting program at Brown University. In 2004, she married Brown University professor and researcher Anne Fausto-Sterling in Massachusetts. In 2008, she left Brown to chair the playwriting department at Yale. She stepped down from that position in 2012.

Glenn Burke: 1952-1995. He was known as “the guy who invented the high five,” when in a game in 1977, Burke was standing on deck as fellow Dodger Dusty Baker was rounding third and headed for home after hitting a home run. As Baker crossed home plate, Burke raised his had. Baker responded by raising his also, and when the two slapped hands, history was made. Believe it or not. And to make the scene complete, Burke then stepped up to the plate and hit a home run of his own.

Burke made another kind of history, after a fashion: he is believed to be the first gay ballplayer who was out to his team mates. According to his 1995 autobiography, Out at Home, Dodgers General Manager Al Campanis offered to pay for his honeymoon if Burke agreed to find a girlfriend and get married. Burke said no. He also angered manager Tommy Lasorda by hanging out with Lasorda’s estranged gay son. The Dodgers soon traded him to the Oakland A’s, where manager Billy Martin called him a faggot in front of his teammates. Burke retired in 1979.

In 1982, Burke became the first former professional league player to come out as gay. He was a hero in his adopted community in San Francisco’s Castro, but without baseball his life soon spiraled downhill. He struggled with drug addiction, and for a while became homeless. He spent several months in prison for grand theft and possession of a controlled substance. His final months were spent with his sister before succumbing to AIDS in 1995 at the age of 42.

If you know of something that belongs on the Agenda, please send it here. Don’t forget to include the basics: who, what, when, where, and URL (if available).

And feel free to consider this your open thread for the day. What’s happening in your world?

Bill

November 16th, 2015

Thank you.

Ben in oakland

November 16th, 2015

First, Jim, thank you very much for BTB. After I read my morning paper, it’s the first place I go among my regular websites. It’s one of the few places I can get intelligent analysis and comments.

Second, thank you for being willing to update it, rather than abandon it. It has become, shall we say, a bit moribund.

Third, you,re going to love retirement. I did it just tHree years ago, with Das Husband’s consent. It has been absolutely wonderful. I onely wish I did it thirty years ago.

Soren456

November 16th, 2015

I don’t imagine that there is any one-size-fits-all advice about retirement, so I won’t try.

But I can say that both my parents are retired, and they are happy as clams. Like you, they did plan for it (the social and time aspects especially) and planning, I suspect, is what makes it work for them; they did not just cut loose and wonder what next.

Both are attorneys and both consider law their life’s calling, so both have stuck with what always called them—and that makes the only advice I dare to offer: go deliberately to some aspect of what has always called you (as you seem prepared to do).

They don’t now have active practices, but maintain bar membership. My dad is writing a legal textbook on international treaties, and my mom is editing a colleague’s legal text, with plans to begin her own. Self-discipline is involved, but they impose their own pace, and I’ve never seen them happier. Or more involved with life.

To them, retirement never meant not working; it meant “working” on their own terms. That seems to be a good way to look at it.

Best wishes, and best of luck—to both of you.

NancyP

November 16th, 2015

Jim, I hope that you have many more years ahead to enjoy retirement. The blog here, even if not refreshed with a lot of new material, gathers a lot of (often harder to find) historical information in easy to digest small segments, and has a lot to offer as “This day in GLBT history”. There are always new people needing to learn this stuff. Anything else over the basic “This day in GLBT history” is gravy. Thanks for your work on this valuable blog.

As for retirement, I have goals outlined already – volunteer as an educator and assistant data gatherer (“citizen scientist”) for the state conservation department and local parks. That, plus lots of camping, hiking, kayaking, reading, and opera listening – more of what I like to do most, but don’t have as much time as I would like.

Jim Burroway

November 16th, 2015

Bill, Ben, Soren, Nancy — thank you for your best wishes. And yes, I do believe that having goals, plans, and day to day obligations are very important for a successful retirement. Otherwise, I might stay in bed and watch trashy reality TV shows all day.

Paul Douglas

November 16th, 2015

Congrats on your upcoming retirement, Jim. I’ve cut back work to 3 days a week and love it. I’ve got at least 3 more years to go, but life is already better. My dad retired at the age of 60 ½ from a high stress job that we all thought would kill him. That was 32 years ago and he’s still going strong. Amazing what cutting the stress down in one’s life can do for you!

Joseph Singer

November 17th, 2015

I am glad you are here. Thanks for all your historical bits.

Eric Payne

November 18th, 2015

Jim,

I’ve taken a couple of days to think about what I wanted to say — or, to be more precise, how I wanted to comment — on your upcoming plans.

First and foremost, I truly hope Box Turtle Bulletin continues, pretty much as is.

The past two years has seen the inevitable fall-out of blogs falling by the wayside, a fate the ultimately awaits the overproduction of any product. When everyone has a blog, advertising dollars become stretched too thin to support any of them and reader interest, as one segues from one blog to another, all saying the same thing, fades.

A lot of these blogs simply folded; others slowly started increasing their titillation content (I’m looking at you, Towleroad and Joe.My.God). You’ve managed to keep BTB “pure.” I admire that’ it’s made BTB my “must read, first” blog of the day, everyday.

There’s something else BTB does that I hsven’t seen any other “gay news” blog even attempt to do: attempt to help give our community a stronger sense of “community” by noting, every single day, some important aspect of our common history. There’s a direct line between Oscar Wilde being jailed to Jim Obergefell getting married and you trace that line in bright, neon colors. Kudos to you.

And, Jim, your investigation of George Reker’s “treatment” of Kirk Murphy — What are Little Boys Made Of? — had a direct impact on me. It was the first time I ever, publicly, commented on aspects of my childhood. In therapy, alone, I thought I’d “healed.” I had… but your expose provided me with an opportunity to publicly share, and the result was cathartic.

Thank you.

Since then, y’all there may think I talk too much. I have some “hot button” issues, to be sure (ex- ex-gays, PrEP, contributors to Prop 8 and gay Republicans) that tend to differ from the opinions of BTB writers. But, again to your credit, those comments are posted and allowed to become part of the discussion.

Jim, it is obvious you are an intelligent, creative person.

I hope your retirement from your “real life” occupation allows for a full-on career as a writer, especially of gay history.

Become the Randy Shilts of the 21st Century; I previously mentioned George Rekers and Kirk Murphy.

There’s a book there that would be an engrossing read to anyone talented enough to delve into those murky, seedy waters to completely reveal the internalized homophobia of so may of these conversion zealots… on how the homophobia was able to so easily encroach lax standards on the scientific community with the help of the religious right and why these therapies are, today, not just being abandoned, but outlawed.

From lobotomy to electric shock to ardent prayer — how are the men and women who had these therapies coping today? Are they gay? Straight? Celibate? How may are currently, you should pardon the expression, fucked up? Do any of the ex-ex-gays still believe they need to become ex-ex-ex-gays and can, somehow, reach that goal?

I’m sorry; I digress.

Thank you for all you’ve done, and for Box Turtle Bulletin. Happy anniversary and many happy returns.

Nathaniel

November 18th, 2015

Jim, I second just about everything everybody has said thus far. I would add that I enjoy the difference of opinions that the various BTB writers and commentors bring to the table. LGBT people can disagree on many things, like our straight neighbors, and still work steadily towards a more free and equal society and world for sexual minorities. By bringing together these various angles to a forum of respectful debate has helped give me a grand picture of LGBT history and current events. I hope you can keep that up, as well.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.