Uganda Parliament Takes Up Anti-Gay Bill Adding Death Sentence and Bans on Free Speech

Jim Burroway

October 14th, 2009

Uganda’s Parliament took up the new Anti-Homosexuality Bill of 2009 today, giving the bill its first reading. Bills undergo three readings before becoming law. BTB previewed the bill last month when we received a surreptitious copy dated April 20. According to the pro-government New Vision newspaper, the bill appears unchanged from the earlier draft:

Aggravated homosexuality will be punished by death, according to a new bill tabled in Parliament yesterday. …A person commits aggravated homosexuality when the victim is a person with disability or below the age of 18, or when the offender is HIV-positive. The bill thus equates aggravated homosexuality to aggravated defilement among people of different sexes, which also carries the death sentence.

The Bill, entitled the Anti-Homosexuality Bill 2009, also states that anyone who commits the offence of homosexuality will be liable to life imprisonment. This was already the case under the current Penal Code Act. However, it gives a broader definition of the offence of homosexuality. A person charged with the offence will have to undergo a mandatory medical examination to ascertain his or her HIV status. The bill further states that anybody who “attempts to commit the offence” is liable to imprisonment for seven years. The same applies to anybody who “aids, abets, counsels or procures another to engage in acts of homosexuality” or anybody who keeps a house or room for the purpose of homosexuality.

The bill also proposes stiff sentences for people promoting homosexuality. They risk a fine of sh100m or prison sentences of five to seven years. This applies to people who produce, publish or distribute pornographic material for purposes of promoting homosexuality, fund or sponsor homosexuality.

The bill’s language prohibiting “promoting homosexuality” does not restrict itself to “pornographic material.” That is an invetion of the New Vision reporter, who equates anything advocating on behalf of LGBT people as pornographic. Instead, the bill addresses anyone invloved in the “production, trafficking, procuring, marketing, broadcasting, disseminating, publishing homosexual materials,” or “who acts as an accomplice or attempts to legitimize or in any way abets homosexuality and related practices.”

The bill also adds an unusual extraterritorial jurisdiction for those who are Ugandan citizens but who engage in same-sex relationships or LGBT advocacy overseas.

Opposition to the bill appears minimal according to The New Vision. It is highly unlikely that many lawmakers will vote against the bill, given the current environment where accusations of homosexuality have become a potent political tool.

This drafting of this bill appears to have coincided with intense lobbying efforts by anti-gay activists following a conference held in Kampala which featured American Holocaust revisionist Scott Lively and Exodus International board member Don Schmierer. Exodus International released a statement “applauding” Don Schierer\’s participation in the conference which ended with calls to strengthen Uganda\’s homosexuality laws. Exodus International president Alan Chambers denies that Exodus supports criminalizing homosexuality. Scott Lively, however, defended criminal laws against gay people.

That anti-gay conference quickly spawned other anti-gay meetings and rallies, including a march on Parliament on April 24, about the time this draft was written. By then, rumors were already circulating that anti-gay politicians sought to eliminate free speech by criminalizing LGBT advocacy, a rumor which was confirmed in Julyby Uganda\’s Minister of State for Ethics and Integrity James Nsaba Buturo. Meanwhile, a full-fledged public vigilante campaign was released on Uganda\’s gay community, leading to several reports of arrests and investigations.

The full text of the draft is available here.

Click here to see BTB\’s complete coverage of recent anti-gay developments in Uganda.


October 14th, 2009

I’d boycott Uganda, but I’ve never seen a product from that country I’d buy. Sounds like they be better off with Idi back. And I’m sorry for that.


October 14th, 2009

So do any of the apologists out there want to claim that this isn’t anti-gay and to call it that is a slur?

Ken in Riverside

October 14th, 2009

So when will the first accusation of homosexuality against a rival politician take place?

David Blakeslee

October 14th, 2009

Thanks for tracking this abuse of power Jim…and for repeatedly drawing attention to Lively’s efforts in this regard.

BTB is an important place to continue to find what we have in common.


October 14th, 2009

Uganda=America if Exodus and the other bigots had their way.

David Blakeslee

October 14th, 2009

@ Penquinsaur,

I don’t think so.

Being frank about Same Sex Attraction or your orientation without fear of criminal prosecution is basic.

Exodus cannot even be frank about what they seek to assist people with if people will be criminally prosecuted for admitting it.


October 14th, 2009

And the Obama Administration has said what about this exactly? Oh yes. I feel that “hope and change”.

David: Then think again because the same folks who are still supporting anti-gay legislation today were all in favor of criminal sodomy laws, among other measures, not too long ago:

So they don’t go as far as advocating the death penalty or life in prison like in Uganda. How “noble” of them.

David C.

October 14th, 2009

Though this is a human rights disaster in the making, I do not expect a peep out of the State Department or even the Obama administration. IN fact, this is very unlikely show up on the radar of national discourse, just as the persecution of LGBT* people in Iraq has essentially gone unreported. About the only groups that will notice are UN NGO’s that follow this kind of thing, while we here in the US will probably hear zero from the MSM. Pathetic. Typical.

Lynn David

October 15th, 2009

Want to boycott, Uganda. Start in England with Tullow Oil PLC – [Tullow Oil plc is registered in England as a public limited company; Registered Office: 3rd Floor, Building 11, Chiswick Park, 566 Chiswick High Road, London, W4 5YS. Registered Number 3919249.]. Tullow is developing oil prospects in the rift valley (Lake Albert Rift Basin in Uganda) and may extend their play into adjacent countries.

Uganda’s army is providing security. Sometimes that security is rather brutal towards villagers who may not be of the same tribes as the army. I have read that some of that brutality includes homosexual rape to degrade the village men. Even the EU says of Uganda, “Assistance is also given to address the humanitarian situation. The country is at the epicentre of the Great Lakes regional conflict zone where three humanitarian crises converge, which has led to massive human displacement and extensive human rights abuses.

If pressure is applied concerning this bill, it seems that it should be better received in Uganda if Great Britain and the EU were to apply it.


October 15th, 2009

While it’s a bit unclear what we in the west can do to effectively oppose this bill, we can at the very least contact Ugandan diplomatic missions in our countries.

In the US the Embassy of the Republic of Uganda can be reached at:

5911 16th Street, NW,
Washington DC 20011
Tel: (202) 726-7100
Fax: (202) 726-1727

A complete list of contacts (including email addresses) is here.

In the UK the Ugandan High Commission can be reached at:

Uganda House
58-59 Trafalgar Square
London WC2N 5DX
Tel : (207) 839-5783
Fax: (207) 839-8925

The US Ambassador to Uganda can be reached here:

Steven A. Browning
P.O. Box 7007,
Tel: +256 414 25 97 91
Fax: +256 414 259 794

A list of Ugandan Embassies and Consulates in other countries can be found here.

While I think Lynn is correct to note that the UK may have a particularly strong position when it comes to applying pressure in opposition to this bill we should not underestimate the enormous esteem which people in East Africa have for President Obama. As Gug at GayUganda observed following Obama’s address to HRC:

Obama’s star is incredibly brighter than that of Museveni, in the hearts of Ugandans. So, when Obama dares to go out and speak favorably to gay citizens in his country, it fascinates Ugandans where gays are an unmentionable pariah entity.

Not to get off track, but it’s interesting to note that as we whine about HRC’s lack of effectiveness and the slow pace of change in the US, people in other parts of the world marvel at the fact that our president actually addresses organizations which are dedicated to promoting gay rights. Sometimes, in our impatience with the political process, we underestimate the real significance of “symbolic” acts like this.

Christopher Waldrop

October 15th, 2009

While the United States would seem to be light years ahead of Uganda, I find it interesting that “the New Vision reporter…equates anything advocating on behalf of LGBT people as pornographic”. That’s often an argument I’ve heard made by people here who oppose teaching tolerance. For some reason even acknowledging the existence of LGBT people is, in the minds of many bigots, “pornographic”.

David Blakeslee

October 15th, 2009

@ John,

your point is well taken…which is why there is much repair to do between the GLBT and religious communities and between GLBT and the legal system.

David Blakeslee

October 15th, 2009

On legal oppression of sexual behavior:

The last sixty years has seen efforts in all areas to decouple legal punishments from many types of sexual behavior.

Controlling sexual behavior is a longstanding value in all religious communities…

Absent existent legal guidelines on minority rights and privacy rights, laws were written based upon tradition, fear and multigenerationally held religious values.

Repression of “sinful behavior” and even thoughts is a valid form of religious practice…but when applied to the legal system it immediately becomes cruel, coersive.

The primary use of legal repression of sexual behavior in the US now applies to prostitution and adult sex with minors.

A second, lower form of repression, is still validated in the civil courts in the area of sexual harrassment.

Thanks again everyone for working to draw attention to this Uganda travesty…Exodus and others need to join your courageous and righteous cause.

Timothy (TRiG)

October 15th, 2009

Well, a few people are publicising this, anyway.


David C.

October 15th, 2009

USAID for humanitarian assistance in Northern Uganda during 2008 was approximately 138 million:

The United States remains committed to rebuilding northern Uganda by providing humanitarian assistance, including food, shelter, water, sanitation, and relief, to vulnerable people. … In 2008, USAID support for northern Uganda totaled an estimated $138 million.

Applying pressure through aid funding or some other economic mechanism is probably about the only thing available to us in this country where it comes to fighting this kind of legislation.

Readers here would be well served to understand the larger situation in Uganda before making an effort to work through US Government channels to prompt some kind of meaningful response to the legislation currently under consideration by the Ugandan Parliament.

Residents of other countries, as mentioned by Lynn David, may have similar levers.

German pride

December 9th, 2009

why dont you live it up to them to ammend their constitution? Afterall they dont interrupt with any other country’s politics or anything. They have a right to live their lives way they want. Why don’t you people yap when it comes to moslem countries punishing the gay by death penalties?! I am not supporting killing people but everyone ought to abide by the constitution governing their country.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.