Uganda Parliament To Take Up Bill Banning LGBT Free Speech

Jim Burroway

July 26th, 2009

Uganda’s Parliament is scheduled to take up a new bill which would strengthen the country’s already draconian statutes against homosexuality. Current law provides for lifetime imprisonment for conviction of its colonial-era anti-sodomy law. The new law, coupled with an anti-pornography bill, will go further by banning all forms of free speech on behalf of LGBT people:

Recently, [Minister of State for Ethics and Integrity James Nsaba] Buturo said that once the two bills are passed into law, it will be an offence to publish and distribute literature on homosexuality.

He also said it would become impossible for homosexuals to address press conferences and attract people to support their cause.

So far, there is no word on what penalties will be applied in the latest efforts to strip LGBT citizens of their free-speech rights.

The latest round of anti-gay actions in Uganda began last March when three American anti-gay activists, including Holocaust revisionist Scott Lively and Exodus International board member Don Schmierer conducted a three-day anti-gay conference in Kampala, the nation’s capital. While there, conference participants met with members of Parliament and called for strengthening that nation’s laws against homosexuality. Government ministers promised to take action later that month. That same-anti-gay conference also served as the impetus for a long-running anti-gay vigilante campaign that continues still. While several people have been caught up in the campaign, while Pentecostal pastors have used it to settle scores with rival pastors.

Click here to see BTB\’s complete coverage of recent anti-gay developments in Uganda.

L. Junius Brutus

July 26th, 2009

This is what fundamentalists in America, and elsewhere, would do if they had the power. Never let down your guard, people.


July 26th, 2009

L. Junius Brutus is exactly right. It’s important to remember that in Lawrence v. Texas, the Family Research Council, Concerned Women for America and others filed friend of the court briefs calling on the court to uphold Texas’ sodomy law.

Now, the religious right is living out its fantasies in Uganda, Russia and other countries.

Joe in California

July 26th, 2009

It’s a shame that we have church and government aid organizations here and elsewhere that send funds and tax dollars to so called christian groups that also promote this stance.
Be aware of where your church and tax dollars are going.


July 26th, 2009

What scares me is that this is how things like the Holocaust start. Barring some action by the international community, things are likely to get much uglier in Uganda.


July 26th, 2009

I’m against the invasion of other countries but someone needs to teach that third-world hellhole a lesson.

R Holmes

July 27th, 2009

Is there anything we can do?


July 27th, 2009

While I agree that the situation in Uganda is deeply troubling, I think it’s important to respond in ways that avoid simplistic and ignorant stereotypes (specifically the characterization of Uganda as a “”third-world hellhole”). I happen to be in Kampala at the moment and want to assure readers that it’s quite friendly and welcoming, though obviously there is deep and profound homophobia here.

R Holmes’ question is the right one: is there anything we, non-Ugandans can do? Certainly we can criticize those in the West (as BTB has been doing) who are encouraging and supporting those who are pushing anti-gay (and anti-democratic, anti-free speech, etc.) measures here. We can contact people here in Uganda to ask them what kinds of support would be helpful. We can contact our elected officials and ask them to push for diplomatic pressure to be applied to condemn laws which criminalize homosexuality and which restrict free speech. We can also write letters to the daily papers here, which are too often vehicles for unadulterated anti-gay bile.

At the same time, it’s important to keep in mind that there is a real danger of creating a backlash against perceived outside interference in internal Ugandan (and Kenyan or African politics). It’s not uncommon for political and social debates (not just on gay issues) to descend into arguments about what’s “African” and what’s “un-African.” It can be tricky to find ways to be supportive of African LGBTs without placing them in an even more vulnerable position.


July 27th, 2009


Sorry for expressing myself that way. I’m just angry at the whole situation. I don’t want to appear prejudiced, but most black people everywhere seem to show contempt for LGBTs. I hope I’m wrong, but I’ve been thinking the only reason South Africa has gay marriage is b/c of its white population.

Timothy Kincaid

July 27th, 2009

South Africa has gay marriage in large part to the support of Desmond Tutu and Nelson Mandela for the gay community.

As for “black people everywhere”, I would caution that we consider for a moment the great number of black leaders in this country who are unabashed in their support, who are willing to call civil rights for gay men and women by that term, and who speak against discrimination directed towards our community.

Yes, like all communities there are some who are bigoted. And there are some are very supportive on some issues but who have not yet adopted full equality for gay men and women. And it is probably true to say that there is at this particular moment in time less support for gay marriage and other forms of equality in black America than in other ethnic subgroups.

But it is a gross misstatement to suggest that “black people everywhere” are homophobic. It just isn’t true.

On a personal note, it was a black friend that I first trusted enough to tell that I’m gay. And I have had many interactions with black heterosexuals since that time and found that most were very supportive.

Richard W. Fitch

July 27th, 2009

Ted Olson & David Boies are currently mounting a legal challenge at the federal level which has as one of its central arguments the SCOTUS ruling regarding Loving vs. Virginia, the landmark case that abolished mixed-race marriage laws in the US. Mildred Loving, an African-American woman, on the 40th anniversary of the decision in June 2007, made this statement:

Surrounded as I am now by wonderful children and grandchildren, not a day goes by that I don’t think of Richard and our love, our right to marry, and how much it meant to me to have that freedom to marry the person precious to me, even if others thought he was the “wrong kind of person” for me to marry. I believe all Americans, no matter their race, no matter their sex, no matter their sexual orientation, should have that same freedom to marry. Government has no business imposing some people’s religious beliefs over others. Especially if it denies people’s civil rights.
I am still not a political person, but I am proud that Richard’s and my name is on a court case that can help reinforce the love, the commitment, the fairness, and the family that so many people, black or white, young or old, gay or straight seek in life. I support the freedom to marry for all. That’s what Loving, and loving, are all about.


August 17th, 2009

I am so glad that someone in this world is standing up to indecency! Wish America was more like that!

Timothy Kincaid

August 18th, 2009


Perhaps you would be happier if America banned free speech so as to preserve “decency” but most Americans find such a loss of freedom to be abhorent.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.