Marriage Rights Around the World

Timothy Kincaid

May 15th, 2008

The following countries offer some form of recognition to same-sex couples:

Marriage

Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, South Africa, United States (Massachusetts, California)

Civil Unions

New Zealand, Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul), Argentina (Buenos Aires, Rio Negro), Mexico (Coahuila), Uruguay, United States (Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, New Jersey)

Registered Partnership or Domestic Partnership

Denmark, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Finland, Luxembourg, , Slovenia, United Kingdom, Czech Republic, Italy (City of Padua), Switzerland, Hungary, Australia (Tasmania), United States (Maine, Washington, Oregon)

Other Methods of Limited Recognition

France (PACS), Germany (Life Partnership), Croatia (Law of Same-Sex Relationships), Andorra (Stable Union of a Couple), Mexico (Mexico City – PACS), Colombia (Common-law marriage inheritance rights), Israel (Limited recognition of foreign legal arrangements), United States (Hawaii – Reciprocal Benefits; New York – recognition of out-of-state legal marriages)

Although recognition is in a rapid state of change, this is my best understanding of the current rights provided. Several nations are in the process of adding or revising recognition.

Ben in Oakland

May 15th, 2008

Ibelieve Hungary has recognized gay relationships via their supreme court, but it is not marriage.

KipEsquire

May 16th, 2008

Denmark is better classified as “civil union” — it is essentially “all but name only” much like New Jersey or Vermont.

Lusitanian

May 16th, 2008

Just a small correction, the Brazilian state that affords civil unions is Rio Grande do Sul. The name is Portuguese, not Spanish.

ebohlman

May 16th, 2008

The US state of Rhode Island and the nation of Israel also recognize “foreign” same-sex marriages.

I can’t remember which, but one of the “domestic partnership” laws in Oregon or Washington creates a status equivalent to civil union (like California’s DP laws did).

Timothy Kincaid

May 16th, 2008

Lusitanian,

Thanks. Correction made.

KipEsquire,

I’m using the language (more or less) that they use. Just as California’s domestic partnerships offered everthing that New Jersey’s civil unions offered, the language was different.

Ebohlman,

Thanks. I am not certain about Israel. I believe some aspects of foreign marriage are recognized, and others not. I keep reading conflicting stories. I’ll include them in the other-limited category.

But while Rhode Island’s law does not ban gay marriage, a court just determined that they do not recognize gay marriages performed elsewhere either (it was a divorce case). Thus, a Rhode Island couple could (unlike residents of 47 other states) marry in Massachusetts but only have their marriage recognized there and now California. While a New York couple cannot marry in Massachusetts, but if they were MA residents that married and moved, it would be recognized in New York.

Timothy Kincaid

May 16th, 2008

And Oregon is the state which explicitely states that all rights granted to married couples are granted to domestic partners.

Washington is taking a more slow process of doling out specific rights.

Timothy Kincaid

May 16th, 2008

Ben,

Starting January 1, 2009, gay couples in Hungary can register their partnerships. Until then they have some rights under Unregistered Cohabitation (a sort of common law recognition).

Although the law isn’t effective until next year, it has already passed and that’s why Hungary is included in Registered Partnerships.

Mark

May 16th, 2008

UK form of legal recongition is called “Civil Partnership” and is legally identical to marriage in all respects except:

. the civil partnership ceremony may not have religious elements
. there is a technical definition of a particular term (can’t remember precisely which) that that presumes opposite-sex parties and therefore doesn’t apply as a reason for dissolution of civil partnerships.

Otherwise, I’m given to understand, all burdens and rights are the same.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.