NOM goes completely wackadoodle

Timothy Kincaid

July 13th, 2010

In the grand spectrum of anti-gay activism that ranges from relatively respectful disagreement through nasty and spiteful on its way to ragingly hateful and on to bizarre and downright insane, Maggie Gallagher and her National Organization for Marriage have managed to retain the appearance of being rational and principled. While their intentions were hostile and based in animus and the presumption of superiority, their rhetoric was more mainstream and avoided trips into the realm of paranoia, villainizing, or blatant hatred.

Until recently.

But increasing Maggie has been losing it, demonstrating an increasingly bitter and hostile persona and saying things that she never would have just a year or so ago.

And things have changed for NOM, as well. No longer behaving like a marriage advocate, NOM now seems to have morphed in to a radical anti-gay activist group with views and opinions similar to those of Peter LaBarbera or Brian Camenker. The new NOM doesn’t love heterosexual marriage anywhere near as much as they dislike gay people in general.

A few weeks ago we let you know about NOM’s merging with an anti-gay extremist group, One Man, One Woman, headed by Louis J. Marinelli. Although at first it seemed that NOM was trying to downplay their affiliation, this tactic has been abandoned and Marinelli’s facebook site is now at least semi-officially the voice of the National Organization for Marriage.

And a nasty voice it is, indeed.

Language about “the best interests of children” has been replaced with ranting about “the homosexual agenda” and posts about how violent gay people are. And Jeremy at Good_As_You has extensively documented Marinelli’s extremism from trying to equate gay people to pedophiles and prostitutes to repeating the old Paul Cameron lies.

Yes, NOM has decided it’s time to attach its bus to the wackadoodle train… and I marvel at that decision. Frankly, I thought Maggie was smarter than that.

Lindoro Almaviva

July 13th, 2010

Then you had a higher opinion of Maggie-Moo than many of us ever did, or had the hope to cultivate.

Bob Barnes

July 13th, 2010

They have absolutely no winning strategy for the courtroom, so her intent is to ramp up the religious-right base with her fraudulent gays vs christ rhetoric.

Cooner

July 13th, 2010

Looks like Barefoot Maggie’s finally kicked the shoes off.

(Oops, sorry.) ^.^

Lucrece

July 13th, 2010

Um, Maggie’s no longer at the helm of the organization. Brown completely replaced her in decision making while she’s off writing books and spreading lies in university debates.

She was smart enough to lower her profile and distance her self from an organization in decline.

Rob

July 14th, 2010

If she was actually smart, that single mother wouldn’t have started NOM in the first place. In 50 years from now, people are going to equate her to the late George Wallace.

Priya Lynn

July 14th, 2010

Timothy said “And things have changed for NOM, as well. No longer behaving like a marriage advocate…”.

The National Organization “For” Marriage never behaved like a marriage advocate. Their sole tactic in “advocating for” marriage has always been to try to prevent gays from marrying – they’ve always been anti-marriage.

Paul in Canada

July 14th, 2010

So, has Maggie/NOM, and others alike, given up on their dream of an American theocracy? Doubt it.

Johnson

July 14th, 2010

Whatever brings in the money, and since it’s obvious NOM is no longer quite the gravy train it once was for Maggie, something had to be done.

ricky

July 14th, 2010

traditional marriage: permission to have sex granted by a religious entity.

Priya Lynn

July 14th, 2010

That about sums it up, doesn’t it Ricky?

Yonmei

July 14th, 2010

Er, didn’t NOM get Orson Scott Card on board not long ago? The SF writer who declared that if the government legalized marriage for teh gays, this was reason enough to overthrow the government? Orson Scott Card, homophobic terrorist.

Jim Stone

July 14th, 2010

OMG Tim!!!!! That pic of Maggie!! I am peeing my pants here! BRILLIANT!!!!

If this horrible woman wasn’t working for NOM she’d only be qualified to be a Wal-Mart greeter!!! (If that!)

Richard Rush

July 14th, 2010

What exactly are Maggie’s qualifications/credentials on the marriage issue, other than the mindless abundant bigotry rising up from her gut? Given that she has become the largest ubiquitous figure in the marriage battle due to her presumed expertise, wouldn’t you have expected her to be the most sought-after witness to testify at the Prop-8 trial? But there was that little problem of cross-examination – Oops.

Well, her most impressive credential is a B.A. degree in Religious Studies from Yale University, which essentially means that her expertise is in the study of how superstitious nonsense is transformed into Magic Truth.

Tony

July 15th, 2010

Here’s a funny observation: Guess what comes up when you dial the letters NOM on a telephone keypad?

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

Jubal

Another Temporary Hiatus

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1971: Minnesota Couple Stake Claim To First American Same-Sex Marriage

Today's Agenda Is Brought To You By...

Today In History, 1954: "Perverts Vanish" From Miami

Born On This Day, 1907: Evelyn Hooker

Born On This Day, 1925: Fr. John J. McNeill

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.